<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"> <style></style> </head> <body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"> <div class="WordSection1"> Greetings Marvin, <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thank you for acknowledging the queries that I had asked and also confining the pass rate.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> When you say one should maintain a clean environment, what does this imply ?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In fact we have taken care of all the pre-requisites that DTS recommends so what to know if we are missing any more configurations on the DUT or TESTER.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Furthermore, is it possible to share the list of NICs which are achieving higher pass rates – say both intel and non-intel.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I am deducing the following from the table that you have mentioned below – please confirm if my assumption is correct<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> UB1610<o:p></o:p> Kernel: 4.8.0-22-generic<o:p></o:p> GCC: 6.2.0<o:p></o:p> NIC: FVL25G (fortville25g)<o:p></o:p> Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc<o:p></o:p> Fail/Total: 5/160<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> As asked appreciate if someone from the community help us know what we are missing on our environment that we are hitting a low pass rate.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In accordance with the same, had shared all the log files and the configuration file from my environment to see if I can get any pointers to proceed ahead.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanking in advance,<o:p></o:p> Chengappa<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: Liu, Yong [mailto:yong.liu@intel.com] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2018 1:50 PM To: M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) <cm-r@hpe.com>; Xu, GangX <gangx.xu@intel.com>; dts@dpdk.org Subject: RE: low pass rate executing dts complete test suite<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hi Chengappa,<o:p></o:p> Most likely your low pass rate was caused by unexpected packets receipt on DUT ports. You need to check whether network manager or dhcp client running on tester server. Test executor as owner of the test server should maintain clean environment. Thus DTS can work as normally.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In our internal regression report, DTS can archive almost 95% pass rate. And this number can be higher after merge some bug fixes. <o:p></o:p> +------------+---------------------------+------------+--------------------------------+--------+-------------------------------------+----------+<o:p></o:p> | UB1610 | FVL25G | Functional | 4.8.0-22-generic | 6.2.0 | x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc | 5/160 |<o:p></o:p> +------------+---------------------------+------------+--------------------------------+--------+-------------------------------------+----------+<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks,<o:p></o:p> Marvin<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt"> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> <a name="_____replyseparator"></a>From: dts [<a href="mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org">mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org</a>] On Behalf Of M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 6:16 PM To: Xu, GangX <<a href="mailto:gangx.xu@intel.com">gangx.xu@intel.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dts@dpdk.org">dts@dpdk.org</a> Subject: Re: [dts] low pass rate executing dts complete test suite Importance: High<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Dear All, <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I am back with some more findings on executing DTS on Intel environment and this time around the pass rate is somewhat around 26.5%<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I was able to achieve this pass rate by the recommendations provided by Xu GangX!<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> However, I am still puzzled as to why I am not having a good pass rate even for Intel NICs<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> It would be of great help if anyone from the community help me achieve good numbers.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Am sharing the output file (attached to with this mail) for reference.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Also I would be interested to know if anyone has achieved 100% pass rate for DTS on INTEL NIC , if so I would like to have a look at the configuration files used for the same and also would like to know the DTS and DPDK versions and Intel NIC type used to achieve 100% pass rate.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Furthermore, am also sharing the screen shot for of the NIC information configured on TESTER and DUT from the iLO GUI<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> TESTER<o:p></o:p> <img border="0" width="1106" height="764" id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image001.png@01D3FF31.1CF00A10"><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> DUT<o:p></o:p> <img border="0" width="1536" height="750" id="_x0000_i1026" src="cid:image002.png@01D3FF31.1CF00A10"><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanking in advance.<o:p></o:p> Chengappa<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: Tu, Lijuan [<a href="mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com">mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com</a>] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 12:27 PM To: M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) <<a href="mailto:cm-r@hpe.com">cm-r@hpe.com</a>>; Xu, GangX <<a href="mailto:gangx.xu@intel.com">gangx.xu@intel.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dts@dpdk.org">dts@dpdk.org</a> Subject: RE: low pass rate executing dts complete test suite<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hi Chengappa<o:p></o:p> answers in-line.<o:p></o:p> <a name="_MailEndCompose"></a><o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: dts [<a href="mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org">mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org</a>] On Behalf Of M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 10:57 AM To: Xu, GangX <<a href="mailto:gangx.xu@intel.com">gangx.xu@intel.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dts@dpdk.org">dts@dpdk.org</a> Subject: Re: [dts] low pass rate executing dts complete test suite<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Greetings Xu, <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Yes seems like I have had used only one port – let me re-run by making the necessary changes in ports.cfg and get back with the observations.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> @ Lijuan Tu,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Please find the answers in-line.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks & Regards,<o:p></o:p> Chengappa<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: Xu, GangX [<a href="mailto:gangx.xu@intel.com">mailto:gangx.xu@intel.com</a>] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:12 AM To: M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) <<a href="mailto:cm-r@hpe.com">cm-r@hpe.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dts@dpdk.org">dts@dpdk.org</a> Subject: RE: low pass rate executing dts complete test suite<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hi Chengappa:<o:p></o:p> How many ports do you use? <o:p> </o:p> In the information you provided, I think you used only one port.<o:p></o:p> Many of the case in dts need two ports or more. <o:p></o:p> e.g. test suite pmd_bonded need 4 ports, you provide 1, it failed at set_up_all show “blocked set_up_all failed” issue.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Xu gang<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: dts [<a href="mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org">mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org</a>] On Behalf Of Tu, Lijuan Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 9:49 PM To: M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) <<a href="mailto:cm-r@hpe.com">cm-r@hpe.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:dts@dpdk.org">dts@dpdk.org</a> Subject: Re: [dts] low pass rate executing dts complete test suite<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hi chengappa,<o:p></o:p> Here are my points:<o:p></o:p> 1, the link might have some issues, such as link down<o:p></o:p> From the result “receive 0 , expect 64”, I think , the link is down<o:p></o:p> You can check your link first before running dts.<o:p></o:p> [Chengappa] sure, will check on this, thank you for the inputs.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> 2, DPDK will change during different version , so DTS will change with it.<o:p></o:p> Which DPDK and DTS ‘s version do you use?<o:p></o:p> From the failed result “set up failed” and timeout , I think your testpmd started failed.<o:p></o:p> Logs in output, you can check them to find the real reason, maybe testpmd’s parameters changed.<o:p></o:p> [Chengappa] <o:p></o:p> Am using DPDK 18.02 with DTS 17.08.0, kindly let me know if there are any issues with the combination am using or version mismatch here?<o:p></o:p> With the log traces I was able to see that the testpmd failed to start – is there anything that I need to tweak to change the testpmd’s parameters to be changed?<o:p></o:p> [Lijuan]<o:p></o:p> I think using DTS 18.02 is the best choices , As I know , there are some changes in offloads, vlan filter/strip default value, crc-strip , promise mode etc.<o:p></o:p> You can check them form git logs.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> From: dts [<a href="mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org">mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org</a>] On Behalf Of M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 7:28 PM To: <a href="mailto:dts@dpdk.org">dts@dpdk.org</a> Subject: [dts] low pass rate executing dts complete test suite<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hello DTS community, <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> As we were investigation on DTS for Niantic (Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit) platform and we are seeing very less pass rate.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> We were under the assumption if we take care of the initial pre-requisites for TESTER and TARGET DUT as described here - <a href="https://dpdk.org/doc/dts/gsg/sys_reqs.html">https://dpdk.org/doc/dts/gsg/sys_reqs.html</a> the DTS framework help us achieve a good pass rate.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Could you please help me by letting know if there are any fine tuning for the TARGET DUT so that I can see a better numbers than the current pass rate of 12.4%<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background:#FBE4D5;border-collapse:collapse"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="413" valign="top" style="width:310.1pt;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"> [root@tester dts]# cat output/statistics.txt<o:p></o:p> Passed = 17<o:p></o:p> Failed = 45<o:p></o:p> Blocked = 68<o:p></o:p> Pass rate = 12.4<o:p></o:p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Some of the specification on the TARGET DUT and current running configuration are as follows<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background:#FBE4D5;border-collapse:collapse"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="700" valign="top" style="width:701.6pt;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"> [root@targetdut ~]# lspci | egrep -i --color 'network|ethernet'<o:p></o:p> 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect NIC (Skyhawk) (rev 10)<o:p></o:p> 04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect NIC (Skyhawk) (rev 10)<o:p></o:p> 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)<o:p></o:p> 05:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)<o:p></o:p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background:#FBE4D5;border-collapse:collapse"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="683" valign="top" style="width:512.6pt;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"> [root@tester dts]# cat conf/ports.cfg<o:p></o:p> # DUT Port Configuration<o:p></o:p> # [DUT IP]<o:p></o:p> # ports=<o:p></o:p> # pci=Pci BDF,intf=Kernel interface;<o:p></o:p> # pci=Pci BDF,mac=Mac address,peer=Tester Pci BDF,numa=Port Numa<o:p></o:p> # pci=Pci BDF,peer=IXIA:card.port<o:p></o:p> # pci=Pci BDF,peer=Tester Pci BDF,tp_ip=$(IP),tp_path=$({PERL_PATH);<o:p></o:p> # pci=Pci BDF,peer=Tester Pci BDF,sec_port=yes,first_port=Pci BDF;<o:p></o:p> # [VM NAME] virtual machine name; This section is for virutal scenario<o:p></o:p> # ports =<o:p></o:p> # dev_idx=device index of ports info, peer=Tester Pci BDF<o:p></o:p> [10.70.2.6]<o:p></o:p> ports =<o:p></o:p> pci=05:00.0,intf=ens2f0;<o:p></o:p> pci=05:00.1,intf=ens2f1;<o:p></o:p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background:#FBE4D5;border-collapse:collapse"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="683" valign="top" style="width:512.6pt;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"> [root@tester dts]# cat executions/execution.cfg<o:p></o:p> [Execution1]<o:p></o:p> crbs=10.70.2.6<o:p></o:p> drivername=igb_uio<o:p></o:p> test_suites=hello_world<o:p></o:p> test_suites=<o:p></o:p> cmdline,<o:p></o:p> hello_world<o:p></o:p> targets=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc<o:p></o:p> parameters=nic_type=niantic:func=true<o:p></o:p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background:#FBE4D5;border-collapse:collapse"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="683" valign="top" style="width:512.6pt;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"> [root@tester dts]# cat conf/crbs.cfg<o:p></o:p> #DUT crbs Configuration<o:p></o:p> #[DUT IP]<o:p></o:p> # dut_ip: DUT ip address<o:p></o:p> # dut_user: Login DUT username<o:p></o:p> # dut_passwd: Login DUT password<o:p></o:p> # os: operation system type linux or freebsd<o:p></o:p> # tester_ip: Tester ip address<o:p></o:p> # tester_passwd: Tester password<o:p></o:p> # ixia_group: IXIA group name<o:p></o:p> # channels: Board channel number<o:p></o:p> # bypass_core0: Whether by pass core0<o:p></o:p> [10.70.2.6]<o:p></o:p> dut_ip=10.70.2.6<o:p></o:p> dut_user=root<o:p></o:p> dut_passwd=HP1nvent<o:p></o:p> os=linux<o:p></o:p> tester_ip=10.70.2.5<o:p></o:p> tester_passwd=HP1nvent<o:p></o:p> channels=4<o:p></o:p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <o:p> </o:p> Snippet of the current results <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <img border="0" width="1551" height="666" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image003.png@01D3FF31.1CF00A10"><o:p></o:p> <img border="0" width="1552" height="646" id="Picture_x0020_2" src="cid:image004.png@01D3FF31.1CF00A10"><o:p></o:p> <img border="0" width="1553" height="646" id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image005.png@01D3FF31.1CF00A10"><o:p></o:p> <img border="0" width="1554" height="541" id="Picture_x0020_4" src="cid:image006.png@01D3FF31.1CF00A10"><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanking in advance,<o:p></o:p> Chengappa<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself....!!<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> </body> </html>