[dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, January 10th

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

Not so far, no. That’s another implementation detail that we’ll need to look into.


Tim

From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagbard at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:15 PM
To: O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll at intel.com>
Cc: Francois Ozog <francois.ozog at linaro.org>; moving at dpdk.org; Dave Neary <dneary at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, January 10th

Has the question of moving the infra (the actual servers/services behind dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org>) over to LF come up?

Ed

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:07 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll at intel.com<mailto:tim.odriscoll at intel.com>> wrote:


> From: Francois Ozog [mailto:francois.ozog at linaro.org<mailto:francois.ozog at linaro.org>]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:09 AM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll at intel.com<mailto:tim.odriscoll at intel.com>>
> Cc: moving at dpdk.org<mailto:moving at dpdk.org>; Dave Neary <dneary at redhat.com<mailto:dneary at redhat.com>>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, January 10th
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> I have missed a couple of calls and did not found notes on the following topic: dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org> domain ownership.
>
> I think i has been a discussion topic during Dublin and thought that Dave Neary may have said (unsure) that it was assumed that the dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org> domain ownership should be transferred to LF.
>
> Was there a discussion/conclusion on this ?

Yes, the question was asked during the discussion in Dublin (by Dave I think). This is what Dave captured in his minutes of that discussion:

"When asked about transferring the ownership of the domain name to Linux
Foundation, Vincent reiterated that his main concern was keeping the
project open, and that he did not anticipate that transferring the
domain ownership would be an issue."

Vincent can confirm, but hopefully this means that there's no issue with this.

>
> Cordially,
>
> FF

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/attachments/20170112/4f9c105d/attachment-0001.html>