[dpdk-stable] patch 'ethdev: revert use port name from device structure' has been queued to stable release 17.08.1

Yuanhan Liu yliu at fridaylinux.org
Tue Nov 21 14:17:29 CET 2017


Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 17.08.1

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 11/24/17. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Thanks.

	--yliu

---
>From 0e131afbde6c0cb7f8b04aadcc4a36585063fb7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:30:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ethdev: revert use port name from device structure

[ upstream commit 72e3efb149ccb72626e77f8926d4dc812fad4e4f ]

This reverts commit a1e7c17555e8f77d520ba5f06ed26c00e77a2bd1.

Original commit assumes there is 1:1 mapping between physical device and
ethdev port, so that device name can be used per port instead of ethdev
name field.

But one physical device may have multiple ethdev ports and each port
needs its own unique name.

One issue reported here:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-September/002484.html

So reverting back the commit to continue using ethdev name field per
port.

Fixes: a1e7c17555e8 ("ethdev: use device name from device structure")

Reported-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
---
 lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index 0597641..ec7d0e7 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -178,11 +178,9 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocated(const char *name)
 	unsigned i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) {
-		if (rte_eth_devices[i].state == RTE_ETH_DEV_ATTACHED &&
-				rte_eth_devices[i].device) {
-			if (!strcmp(rte_eth_devices[i].device->name, name))
-				return &rte_eth_devices[i];
-		}
+		if ((rte_eth_devices[i].state == RTE_ETH_DEV_ATTACHED) &&
+		    strcmp(rte_eth_devices[i].data->name, name) == 0)
+			return &rte_eth_devices[i];
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -319,7 +317,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_count(void)
 int
 rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(uint8_t port_id, char *name)
 {
-	const char *tmp;
+	char *tmp;
 
 	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL);
 
@@ -330,7 +328,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(uint8_t port_id, char *name)
 
 	/* shouldn't check 'rte_eth_devices[i].data',
 	 * because it might be overwritten by VDEV PMD */
-	tmp = rte_eth_devices[port_id].device->name;
+	tmp = rte_eth_dev_data[port_id].name;
 	strcpy(name, tmp);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -338,7 +336,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(uint8_t port_id, char *name)
 int
 rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(const char *name, uint8_t *port_id)
 {
-	int ret;
 	int i;
 
 	if (name == NULL) {
@@ -347,13 +344,11 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(const char *name, uint8_t *port_id)
 	}
 
 	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i) {
-		if (!rte_eth_devices[i].device)
-			continue;
+		if (!strncmp(name,
+			rte_eth_dev_data[i].name, strlen(name))) {
 
-		ret = strncmp(name, rte_eth_devices[i].device->name,
-				strlen(name));
-		if (ret == 0) {
 			*port_id = i;
+
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}
@@ -436,8 +431,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_detach(uint8_t port_id, char *name)
 	if (rte_eth_dev_is_detachable(port_id))
 		goto err;
 
-	snprintf(name, RTE_DEV_NAME_MAX_LEN, "%s",
-		 rte_eth_devices[port_id].device->name);
+	snprintf(name, sizeof(rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->name),
+		 "%s", rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->name);
 
 	ret = rte_eal_dev_detach(rte_eth_devices[port_id].device);
 	if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.7.4



More information about the stable mailing list