[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/flow_filtering: add rte_fdir_conf initialization

[Ori Kam]

Hi Rosen,

Why do the fdir_conf must be initialized?

What is the issue you are seeing?

Best,
Ori

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Rosen Xu
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:10 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: rosen.xu at intel.com; ferruh.yigit at intel.com; Ori Kam
> <orika at mellanox.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/flow_filtering: add rte_fdir_conf
> initialization
> 
> Rte_fdir_conf of rte_eth_conf should be initialized before
> port initialization.
> 
> Fixes: 4a3ef59a10c8 ("examples/flow_filtering: add simple demo of flow
> API")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu at intel.com>
> ---
>  examples/flow_filtering/main.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/flow_filtering/main.c b/examples/flow_filtering/main.c
> index f595034..aa03e23 100644
> --- a/examples/flow_filtering/main.c
> +++ b/examples/flow_filtering/main.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,12 @@
>  				DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM  |
>  				DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO,
>  		},
> +		.fdir_conf = {
> +			.mode = RTE_FDIR_MODE_PERFECT,
> +			.pballoc = RTE_FDIR_PBALLOC_64K,
> +			.status = RTE_FDIR_REPORT_STATUS,
> +			.drop_queue = 127,
> +		},
>  	};
>  	struct rte_eth_txconf txq_conf;
>  	struct rte_eth_rxconf rxq_conf;
> --
> 1.8.3.1