[dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: add support for VLAN in IP mode FDIR

[Lu, Wenzhuo]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:31 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: add support for VLAN in IP mode FDIR
> 
> Hi, wenzhuo
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:26 AM
> > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: add support for VLAN in IP mode FDIR
> >
> > Hi Wei,
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zhao1, Wei
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 5:12 PM
> > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org; Zhao1, Wei
> > > <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: add support for VLAN in IP mode FDIR
> > >
> > > In IP mode FDIR, X550 can support not only 4 tuple parameters but
> > > also vlan tci in protocol, so add this feature to flow parser.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 11777435c727 ("net/ixgbe: parse flow director filter")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> > > ---

> >
> > >  		item = next_no_void_pattern(pattern, item);
> > > -		if (item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4) {
> > > +		if (item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 &&
> > > +				item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN)
> > {
> > >  			rte_flow_error_set(error,
> > >  			  EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> > >  			  item, "Not supported by ntuple filter");
> > Really confused. I see the above code is already wrapped by " if
> > (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN) {". You want to support
> double vlan?
> 
> No, I have get a report that some use the following mode
> sendp([Ether(dst="A0:36:9F:BD:5D:B0")/Dot1Q(vlan=1)/IP(src="192.168.0.1",d
> st="192.168.0.2",tos=2,ttl=40)/UDP(dport=23,
> sport=22)/Raw('x'*100)],iface="enp3s0f0",count=10)
> to test fdir IP mode.
> In order to support this, we need this patch.
I can understand the change in ' ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter_normal' is to support this case.
What I cannot understand is the above change. The original code is already for the case vlan + IPv4.