[dpdk-stable] patch 'net/tap: fix isolation mode toggling' has been queued to stable release 18.02.2

luca.boccassi at gmail.com luca.boccassi at gmail.com
Wed May 23 14:09:14 CEST 2018


Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 18.02.2

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 05/25/18. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Thanks.

Luca Boccassi

---
>From f7b5d10171989dec8a4322594e1d3d8e8790d518 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ophir Munk <ophirmu at mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 22:26:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net/tap: fix isolation mode toggling

[ upstream commit 2ef1c0da894a9534d41475b8240cff1d04e79fdf ]

Running testpmd command "flow isolae <port> 0" (i.e. disabling flow
isolation) followed by command "flow isolate <port> 1" (i.e. enabling
flow isolation) may result in a TAP error:
PMD: Kernel refused TC filter rule creation (17): File exists

Root cause analysis: when disabling flow isolation we keep the local
rule to redirect packets on TX (TAP_REMOTE_TX index) while we add it
again when enabling flow isolation. As a result this rule is added
two times in a row which results in "File exists" error.
The fix is to identify the "File exists" error and silently ignore it.

Another issue occurs when enabling isolation mode several times in a
row in which case the same tc rules are added consecutively and
rte_flow structs are added to a linked list before removing the
previous rte_flow structs.
The fix is to act upon isolation mode command only when there is a
change from "0" to "1" (or vice versa).

Fixes: f503d2694825 ("net/tap: support flow API isolated mode")

Reviewed-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu at mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles at intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/tap/tap_flow.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/tap_flow.c b/drivers/net/tap/tap_flow.c
index 551b2d83d..84ecf0936 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/tap_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/tap_flow.c
@@ -1545,10 +1545,14 @@ tap_flow_isolate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 {
 	struct pmd_internals *pmd = dev->data->dev_private;
 
+	/* normalize 'set' variable to contain 0 or 1 values */
 	if (set)
-		pmd->flow_isolate = 1;
-	else
-		pmd->flow_isolate = 0;
+		set = 1;
+	/* if already in the right isolation mode - nothing to do */
+	if ((set ^ pmd->flow_isolate) == 0)
+		return 0;
+	/* mark the isolation mode for tap_flow_implicit_create() */
+	pmd->flow_isolate = set;
 	/*
 	 * If netdevice is there, setup appropriate flow rules immediately.
 	 * Otherwise it will be set when bringing up the netdevice (tun_alloc).
@@ -1556,20 +1560,20 @@ tap_flow_isolate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	if (!pmd->rxq[0].fd)
 		return 0;
 	if (set) {
-		struct rte_flow *flow;
+		struct rte_flow *remote_flow;
 
 		while (1) {
-			flow = LIST_FIRST(&pmd->implicit_flows);
-			if (!flow)
+			remote_flow = LIST_FIRST(&pmd->implicit_flows);
+			if (!remote_flow)
 				break;
 			/*
 			 * Remove all implicit rules on the remote.
 			 * Keep the local rule to redirect packets on TX.
 			 * Keep also the last implicit local rule: ISOLATE.
 			 */
-			if (flow->msg.t.tcm_ifindex == pmd->if_index)
+			if (remote_flow->msg.t.tcm_ifindex == pmd->if_index)
 				break;
-			if (tap_flow_destroy_pmd(pmd, flow, NULL) < 0)
+			if (tap_flow_destroy_pmd(pmd, remote_flow, NULL) < 0)
 				goto error;
 		}
 		/* Switch the TC rule according to pmd->flow_isolate */
@@ -1716,8 +1720,8 @@ int tap_flow_implicit_create(struct pmd_internals *pmd,
 	}
 	err = tap_nl_recv_ack(pmd->nlsk_fd);
 	if (err < 0) {
-		/* Silently ignore re-entering remote promiscuous rule */
-		if (errno == EEXIST && idx == TAP_REMOTE_PROMISC)
+		/* Silently ignore re-entering existing rule */
+		if (errno == EEXIST)
 			goto success;
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
 			"Kernel refused TC filter rule creation (%d): %s\n",
-- 
2.14.2



More information about the stable mailing list