[dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/3] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail
Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
Gavin.Hu at arm.com
Wed Sep 26 11:29:36 CEST 2018
+Justin He for review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu at arm.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:17 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu at arm.com>; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>; Steve Capper
> <Steve.Capper at arm.com>; Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl at arm.com>;
> jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com; nd <nd at arm.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail
>
> Synchronize the load-acquire of the tail and the store-release within
> update_tail, the store release ensures all the ring operations, enqueue or
> dequeue, are seen by the observers on the other side as soon as they see
> the updated tail. The load-acquire is needed here as the data dependency is
> not a reliable way for ordering as the compiler might break it by saving to
> temporary values to boost performance.
> When computing the free_entries and avail_entries, use atomic semantics to
> load the heads and tails instead.
>
> The patch was benchmarked with test/ring_perf_autotest and it decreases
> the enqueue/dequeue latency by 5% ~ 27.6% with two lcores, the real gains
> are dependent on the number of lcores, depth of the ring, SPSC or MPMC.
> For 1 lcore, it also improves a little, about 3 ~ 4%.
> It is a big improvement, in case of MPMC, with two lcores and ring size of 32,
> it saves latency up to (3.26-2.36)/3.26 = 27.6%.
>
> This patch is a bug fix, while the improvement is a bonus. In our analysis the
> improvement comes from the cacheline pre-filling after hoisting load-
> acquire from _atomic_compare_exchange_n up above.
>
> The test command:
> $sudo ./test/test/test -l 16-19,44-47,72-75,100-103 -n 4 --socket-mem=\
> 1024 -- -i
>
> Test result with this patch(two cores):
> SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 5.86
> MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 10.15 SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size:
> 32): 1.94 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 2.36
>
> In comparison of the test result without this patch:
> SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 6.67
> MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 13.12 SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size:
> 32): 2.04 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 3.26
>
> Fixes: 39368ebfc6 ("ring: introduce C11 memory model barrier option")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl at arm.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> index 234fea0..0eae3b3 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> @@ -68,13 +68,18 @@ __rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r,
> unsigned int is_sp,
> *old_head = __atomic_load_n(&r->prod.head,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>
> - /*
> - * The subtraction is done between two unsigned 32bits
> value
> + /* load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
> + * in update_tail.
> + */
> + const uint32_t cons_tail = __atomic_load_n(&r->cons.tail,
> +
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> +
> + /* The subtraction is done between two unsigned 32bits
> value
> * (the result is always modulo 32 bits even if we have
> * *old_head > cons_tail). So 'free_entries' is always
> between 0
> * and capacity (which is < size).
> */
> - *free_entries = (capacity + r->cons.tail - *old_head);
> + *free_entries = (capacity + cons_tail - *old_head);
>
> /* check that we have enough room in ring */
> if (unlikely(n > *free_entries))
> @@ -132,15 +137,22 @@ __rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, int
> is_sc,
> do {
> /* Restore n as it may change every loop */
> n = max;
> +
> *old_head = __atomic_load_n(&r->cons.head,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
>
> + /* this load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
> + * in update_tail.
> + */
> + const uint32_t prod_tail = __atomic_load_n(&r->prod.tail,
> + __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> +
> /* The subtraction is done between two unsigned 32bits
> value
> * (the result is always modulo 32 bits even if we have
> * cons_head > prod_tail). So 'entries' is always between 0
> * and size(ring)-1.
> */
> - *entries = (r->prod.tail - *old_head);
> + *entries = (prod_tail - *old_head);
>
> /* Set the actual entries for dequeue */
> if (n > *entries)
> --
> 2.7.4
More information about the stable
mailing list