[dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 3/3] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop
Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
Gavin.Hu at arm.com
Wed Sep 26 11:29:59 CEST 2018
+Justin He for review
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu at arm.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:17 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu at arm.com>; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>; Steve Capper
> <Steve.Capper at arm.com>; Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl at arm.com>;
> jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com; nd <nd at arm.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop
>
> In __rte_ring_move_prod_head, move the __atomic_load_n up and out of
> the do {} while loop as upon failure the old_head will be updated, another
> load is costly and not necessary.
>
> This helps a little on the latency,about 1~5%.
>
> Test result with the patch(two cores):
> SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 5.64
> MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 8): 9.58
> SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size: 32): 1.98 MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size:
> 32): 2.30
>
> Fixes: 39368ebfc6 ("ring: introduce C11 memory model barrier option")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl at arm.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> index 0eae3b3..95cc508 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> @@ -61,13 +61,11 @@ __rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r,
> unsigned int is_sp,
> unsigned int max = n;
> int success;
>
> + *old_head = __atomic_load_n(&r->prod.head,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> do {
> /* Reset n to the initial burst count */
> n = max;
>
> - *old_head = __atomic_load_n(&r->prod.head,
> - __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> -
> /* load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
> * in update_tail.
> */
> @@ -93,6 +91,7 @@ __rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r,
> unsigned int is_sp,
> if (is_sp)
> r->prod.head = *new_head, success = 1;
> else
> + /* on failure, *old_head is updated */
> success = __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&r-
> >prod.head,
> old_head, *new_head,
> 0, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE,
> @@ -134,13 +133,11 @@ __rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, int
> is_sc,
> int success;
>
> /* move cons.head atomically */
> + *old_head = __atomic_load_n(&r->cons.head,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> do {
> /* Restore n as it may change every loop */
> n = max;
>
> - *old_head = __atomic_load_n(&r->cons.head,
> - __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> -
> /* this load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
> * in update_tail.
> */
> @@ -165,6 +162,7 @@ __rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, int
> is_sc,
> if (is_sc)
> r->cons.head = *new_head, success = 1;
> else
> + /* on failure, *old_head will be updated */
> success = __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&r-
> >cons.head,
> old_head,
> *new_head,
> 0,
> __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE,
> --
> 2.7.4
More information about the stable
mailing list