[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [v2 0/5] fix dereference after null check coverity

[Zhang, Xiao]

Got it. Thanks Xiaolong and Qi.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, Xiaolong
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 10:01 PM
> To: Zhang, Xiao <xiao.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang at intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v2 0/5] fix dereference after null check coverity
> 
> Hi, Xiao
> 
> On 08/06, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ye Xiaolong
> >> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 11:46 PM
> >> To: Zhang, Xiao <xiao.zhang at intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang at intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> >> <beilei.xing at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v2 0/5] fix dereference after null check
> >> coverity
> >>
> >> On 08/06, Xiao Zhang wrote:
> >> >This patch tries to fix (dereference after null check) coverity issue.
> >> >The address of first segmented packets for ice, iavf, i40e fm10k and
> >> >ixgbe was not set correctly during reassembling packets which led to
> >> >this
> >> issue.
> >> >
> >> >Coverity issue: 343452
> >> >Coverity issue: 343407
> >> >Fixes: c68a52b8 ("net/ice: support vector SSE in Rx") Coverity issue:
> >> >343447
> >> >Fixes: 319c421f ("net/avf: enable SSE Rx Tx") Coverity issue: 343422
> >> >Coverity issue: 343403
> >> >Fixes: ca74903b ("net/i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from
> >> >vector
> >> >driver") Coverity issue: 343416
> >> >Fixes: fe65e1e1 ("fm10k: add vector scatter Rx") Coverity issue:
> >> >13245
> >> >Fixes: 8a44c15a ("net/ixgbe: extract non-x86 specific code from
> >> >vector
> >> >driver")
> >
> >Fix tag size should be 12
> 
> You can add below alias section to you git config file to create proper fix tag
> conveniently.
> 
> [alias]
>         fixline = log -1 --abbrev=12 --format='Fixes: %h (\"%s\")%nCc: %ae'
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong