[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: test zero socket-mem as valid
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Sat Jan 26 19:20:02 CET 2019
25/01/2019 15:12, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 25-Jan-19 2:00 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 25.01.2019 16:48, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> >> On 25-Jan-19 9:53 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com <mailto:david.marchand at redhat.com>>
> >>
> >> Now that i think of it, maybe it's not that simple.
> >>
> >> --socket-mem/-m flag with zero is still an invalid value *if* --legacy-mem is involved. However, it is a valid value in non-legacy mode.
> >>
> >> So maybe the test should reflect this, and the previous fix should have instead added a check for legacy mode rather than disabling the zero check outright.
> >>
> >
> > I don't think that it's a big deal, because "--socket-mem=0 --legacy-mem"
> > quickly fails with clear:
> >
> > EAL: WARNING: Master core has no memory on local socket!
> >
> > IMHO, It's actually more informative than previous:
> >
> > EAL: invalid parameters for --socket-limit
> >
> > I agree that we could add a test for a legacy-mem cases, but that's a bit
> > different task.
>
> Good point. Maybe leave it as is then :)
>
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
Applied, thanks
More information about the stable
mailing list