[dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/4] devtools: handle section suppression

[David Marchand]

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 7:16 PM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:18 PM Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:34:18PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
>> > Even if rare, the check script should handle removing a section.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 4bec48184e33 ("devtools: add checks for ABI symbol addition")
>> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 1 +
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> > index 8da7650..d5fad04 100755
>> > --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> > +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
>> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ build_map_changes()
>> >               # symbol rule below
>> >               /^.*{/ {
>> >                       gsub("+", "");
>> > +                     gsub("-", "");
>> >                       if (in_map == 1) {
>> >                               sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
>> >                       }
>> > --
>> > 1.8.3.1
>> >
>> >
>> Don't you also need to add some logic in the symbol detection match rule
>> to
>> print an appropriate indicator that a symbol is being removed?  With just
>> this
>> change, you will note that you are parsing a section, but you will never
>> trigger
>> a symbol match
>>
>
> I do remember seeing a warning about the "-EXPERIMENTAL" section.
> And this is why I added this.
> But since then I reorganised my series and eliminated some parts... so you
> are most likely right.
> I will double check and repost.
>
>
Yes, you are right, I moved this out of another patch that I ended up not
sending.
But it makes no sense by itself.
I will drop this in v2.

Any comments on the other patches ?
Thanks Neil.


-- 
David Marchand