[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 18.11] eal: fix cleanup in no-shconf mode

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu May 9 19:50:37 CEST 2019


On 5/9/2019 6:50 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/24/2019 4:26 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>> In no-shconf mode, there is no need to clean runtime directory
>> because it's not created in the first place.
>>
>> Fixes: 0a529578f162 ("eal: clean up unused files on initialization")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
> 
> Is this for 18.11.x LTS?
> cc'ed the stable mail list assuming that is the case.

+Kevin

> 
> Is this valid for 19.05 too?
> 
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
>> index 30138b638..59497d04a 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
>> @@ -1214,8 +1214,11 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
>>  	 * whether we are primary or secondary process, but we cannot remove
>>  	 * primary process' files because secondary should be able to run even
>>  	 * if primary process is dead.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * In no_shconf mode, no runtime directory is created in the first
>> +	 * place, so no cleanup needed.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (eal_clean_runtime_dir() < 0) {
>> +	if (!internal_config.no_shconf && eal_clean_runtime_dir() < 0) {
>>  		rte_eal_init_alert("Cannot clear runtime directory\n");
>>  		return -1;
>>  	}
>>
> 



More information about the stable mailing list