[dpdk-stable] [v2 PATCH 4/8] net/ipn3ke: remove useless if statement

[Kevin Traynor]

Coverity complains that this statement is not needed as the goto
label is on the next line anyway. Remove the if statement.

653        ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
   CID 337930 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
   (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
   when the condition ret is true or false, because the code in the
   if-then branch and after the if statement is identical. Should
   the if statement be removed?
654        if (ret)
655                goto end;
   implicit_else: The code from the above if-then branch is identical
   to the code after the if statement.
656end:

Coverity issue: 337930
Fixes: c01c748e4ae6 ("net/ipn3ke: add new driver")
Cc: rosen.xu at intel.com
Cc: stable at dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
index 28d8aaf2d..af87fda6b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
@@ -738,6 +738,5 @@ ipn3ke_cfg_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
 
 	ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
-	if (ret)
-		goto end;
+
 end:
 	if (kvlist)
-- 
2.21.0