[dpdk-stable] [PATCH] ethdev: avoid undefined behaviour on configuration copying
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Nov 19 14:19:21 CET 2019
On 11/19/2019 12:36 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 11/19/19 3:24 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 11/19/2019 8:22 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>>> memcpy() source and destination areas must not overlap and equal
>>> pointers is the case which is really met, so handle it.
>> Agree providing same config as input can cause problem with current
>> implementation, but it is the limitation of the memcpy, the API doesn't request
>> this.
>>
>> We can fix as you suggested, in this case we should document this in API
>> documentation I think,
>
> Basically the patch solves it and there is nothing to document.
> If pointers are equal there is nothing to do, no copying required.
You are right, scratch my comment. I overlooked as just overlapping memory issue.
>
>> we can also solve this by updating the implementation to let this, using an
>> interim buffer in the simplest measure, not sure which one is better.
>
> I don't think that interim buffer is required, 'if' perfectly does the job.
>
>> Any practical reason to prevent this other than 'memcpy' limitation?
>
> Nothing except application should not play with dev->data,
+1.
Bonding PMD though not exactly an application, not sure to let or not it to
update 'dev->data'
> but I'm not sure if it is the right place to forbid it.
>
> Alternative solution is to fix bonding and return error if dev_conf is
> equal to &dev->data->dev_conf since usecase is unclear and callers
> should not use dev->data.
>
>>> Fixes: 68b931bff287 ("ethdev: eliminate interim variable")
>>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
>>> ---
>>> slave_configure() in drivers/net/bonding calls rte_eth_dev_configure()
>>> with &slave_eth_dev->data->dev_conf.
>>>
>>> Alternative solution is to fix bonding and return error if dev_conf is
>>> equal to &dev->data->dev_conf since usecase is unclear and callers
>>> should not use dev->data.
>>>
>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> index 8f48e8d659..8d2ce31a81 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -1245,7 +1245,9 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>> * Copy the dev_conf parameter into the dev structure.
>>> * rte_eth_dev_info_get() requires dev_conf, copy it before dev_info get
>>> */
>>> - memcpy(&dev->data->dev_conf, dev_conf, sizeof(dev->data->dev_conf));
>>> + if (dev_conf != &dev->data->dev_conf)
>>> + memcpy(&dev->data->dev_conf, dev_conf,
>>> + sizeof(dev->data->dev_conf));
>>>
>>> ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
>>> if (ret != 0)
>>>
>
More information about the stable
mailing list