[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix segfault using invalid port
Yang, Qiming
qiming.yang at intel.com
Tue Oct 29 07:15:15 CET 2019
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, Xiaolong
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 11:04 AM
> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang at intel.com>
> Cc: Jiang, JunyuX <junyux.jiang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Chas Williams
> <chas3 at att.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix segfault using invalid port
>
> On 10/28, Yang, Qiming wrote:
> >Hi, Junyu
> >
> >> + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port];
> >> + internals = dev->data->dev_private;
> >Have you build success? I think we need to add (struct bond_dev_private *)
> for force transfer
>
> dev_private is a void *, an explicit type conversion is not needed here.
OK, I saw the original code used.
- struct bond_dev_private *internals = (struct bond_dev_private *)
- dev->data->dev_private;
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
> >
> >>
> >> if (check_for_bonded_ethdev(dev) != 0)
> >> return -1;
> >> @@ -1689,9 +1696,14 @@ int
> >> rte_eth_bond_8023ad_dedicated_queues_disable(uint16_t port) {
> >> int retval = 0;
> >> - struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port];
> >> - struct bond_dev_private *internals = (struct bond_dev_private *)
> >> - dev->data->dev_private;
> >> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> >> + struct bond_dev_private *internals;
> >> +
> >> + if (valid_bonded_port_id(port) != 0)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port];
> >> + internals = dev->data->dev_private;
> >Same as before
> >
> >>
> >> if (check_for_bonded_ethdev(dev) != 0)
> >> return -1;
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >
More information about the stable
mailing list