[dpdk-stable] patch 'test/ipsec: fix a typo in function name' has been queued to stable release 19.11.1

[luca.boccassi at gmail.com]

Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.1

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 02/29/20. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Thanks.

Luca Boccassi

---
>From c5ea96545388c148135df302be95930f46025ba2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:26:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] test/ipsec: fix a typo in function name

[ upstream commit e162f1a7513480f66ed9407cecd83d17954c5f36 ]

The name of the static function check_cryptodev_capablity()
is fixed for the word "capability".
There is no functional change.

The same typo is fixed in a comment in ip_fragmentation example.

Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_ipsec.c            | 4 ++--
 examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 7dc83fee7e..9e14472938 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ fill_crypto_xform(struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params,
 }
 
 static int
-check_cryptodev_capablity(const struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut,
+check_cryptodev_capability(const struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut,
 		uint8_t dev_id)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_idx cap_idx;
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
 
 	/* Find first valid crypto device */
 	for (i = 0; i < nb_devs; i++) {
-		rc = check_cryptodev_capablity(ut_params, i);
+		rc = check_cryptodev_capability(ut_params, i);
 		if (rc == 0) {
 			ts_params->valid_dev = i;
 			ts_params->valid_dev_found = 1;
diff --git a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
index 104612339c..28febf49e7 100644
--- a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
+++ b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ check_all_ports_link_status(uint32_t port_mask)
 	}
 }
 
-/* Check L3 packet type detection capablity of the NIC port */
+/* Check L3 packet type detection capability of the NIC port */
 static int
 check_ptype(int portid)
 {
-- 
2.20.1

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2020-02-27 09:31:55.883438030 +0000
+++ 0001-test-ipsec-fix-a-typo-in-function-name.patch	2020-02-27 09:31:55.627945083 +0000
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
-From e162f1a7513480f66ed9407cecd83d17954c5f36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From c5ea96545388c148135df302be95930f46025ba2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:26:50 +0100
 Subject: [PATCH] test/ipsec: fix a typo in function name
 
+[ upstream commit e162f1a7513480f66ed9407cecd83d17954c5f36 ]
+
 The name of the static function check_cryptodev_capablity()
 is fixed for the word "capability".
 There is no functional change.
@@ -10,7 +12,6 @@
 The same typo is fixed in a comment in ip_fragmentation example.
 
 Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
-Cc: stable at dpdk.org
 
 Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
 Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>