[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: fix check for vfio_group_fd

[wangyunjian]

Ping for review

Thanks,
Yunjian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktraynor at redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 6:45 PM
> To: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>; David Marchand
> <david.marchand at redhat.com>; wangyunjian <wangyunjian at huawei.com>;
> Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>
> Cc: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>;
> Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena at nxp.com>; Lilijun (Jerry)
> <jerry.lilijun at huawei.com>; xudingke <xudingke at huawei.com>; dpdk stable
> <stable at dpdk.org>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: fix check for
> vfio_group_fd
> 
> On 21/05/2020 13:53, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> > On 19-May-20 8:43 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:42 AM wangyunjian <wangyunjian at huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian at huawei.com>
> >>>
> >>> The issue is that a file descriptor at 0 is a valid one. Currently
> >>> the file not found, the return value will be set to 0. As a result,
> >>> it is impossible to distinguish between a correct descriptor and a
> >>> failed return value. Fix it to return -ENOENT instead of 0.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: b758423bc4fe ("vfio: fix race condition with sysfs")
> >>> Fixes: ff0b67d1c868 ("vfio: DMA mappinge")
> >>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >>
> >> This patch reverts the (marked for stable) fix b758423bc4fe ("vfio:
> >> fix race condition with sysfs") and comes with a different fix.
> >>
> >> - Kevin, Luca, I would put this b758423bc4fe backport on hold.
> >>
> >> - Anatoly, I don't want to put 20.05 at risk.
> >> My simple question for 20.05 is, should we revert b758423bc4fe?
> >
> > No, let's not revert anything.
> >
> > As far as i can tell, this patch is a more complete fix, but it
> > essentially does the same thing, just in a different (and better) way.
> > Still, i haven't reviewed it in detail.
> >
> 
> b758423bc4fe was not reverted in master - should that be backported now?
> or should we wait until this new fix is ready for backport too?
> 
> >>
> >> - This patchset will go to 20.08 as I don't feel confident in taking it now.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, let's leave it for 20.08.
> >