[dpdk-stable] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] eal: fix macros to align value
Harman Kalra
hkalra at marvell.com
Wed Jun 24 10:24:30 CEST 2020
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 09/06/2020 21:17, Harman Kalra:
> > Found an issue while using RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR with an
> > expression, like as passed in estimate_tsc_freq().
> > RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR resulted in unexpected value in the
> > above function as division has more precedence over
> > substraction.
>
> The only change I see is adding parenthesis around v.
> Am I right?
Yes, parathesis are required if an expression is passed.
>
> > #define RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(v, mul) \
> > - (((v + (typeof(v))(mul) - 1) / ((typeof(v))(mul))) * (typeof(v))(mul))
> > + ((((v) + (typeof(v))(mul) - 1) / ((typeof(v))(mul))) * (typeof(v))(mul))
> [...]
> > #define RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(v, mul) \
> > - ((v / ((typeof(v))(mul))) * (typeof(v))(mul))
> > + (((v) / ((typeof(v))(mul))) * (typeof(v))(mul))
> [...]
> > ({ \
> > typeof(v) ceil = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(v, mul); \
> > typeof(v) floor = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(v, mul); \
> > - (ceil - v) > (v - floor) ? floor : ceil; \
> > + (ceil - (v)) > ((v) - floor) ? floor : ceil; \
> > })
>
>
>
>
More information about the stable
mailing list