[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] timer: add limitation note for sync stop and reset

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Thu Oct 8 16:11:28 CEST 2020


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:58 PM Carrillo, Erik G
<erik.g.carrillo at intel.com> wrote:
> > Since we go with documenting a limitation, should we mark the original
> > patches [1] and [2] as rejected instead of deferred?
> >
> > 1: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75156/
> > 2: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/73683/
> >
> >
> Thanks, David.
>
> Yes, those patches should be moved to "rejected" - I tried to do it myself, but got permission errors.  Sarosh, can you make these updates?

I updated them.
Thanks Erik.


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the stable mailing list