[dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/failsafe: check correct error code while handling sub-device add
Gaëtan Rivet
grive at u256.net
Thu Oct 15 12:11:42 CEST 2020
On 02/10/20 17:01 -0700, Long Li wrote:
> From: Long Li <longli at microsoft.com>
>
> When adding a sub-device, it's possible that the sub-device is configured
> successfully but later fails to start. This error should not be masked.
> The driver needs to check the error status to prevent endless loop of
> trying to start the sub-device.
>
> fixes (ae80146c5a1b net/failsafe: fix removed device handling)
>
> cc: stable at dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli at microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h
> index 651578a..c58c0de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ int failsafe_eth_new_event_callback(uint16_t port_id,
> fs_err(struct sub_device *sdev, int err)
> {
> /* A device removal shouldn't be reported as an error. */
> - if (sdev->remove == 1 || err == -EIO)
> + if (sdev->remove == 1 && err == -EIO)
> return rte_errno = 0;
> return err;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
This bug has been fixed by the following commit:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-October/185921.html
Thanks for validating this other fix Li, it has been
integrated.
This patch can be dropped (nack).
--
Gaëtan
More information about the stable
mailing list