[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return value

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Apr 20 10:08:57 CEST 2021


On 3/25/2021 8:46 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Xiaozhen Ban
>> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 12:08 PM
>> To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo at intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at intel.com>
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stable at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return value
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Xiaozhen Ban <benhaz1024 at gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 19:44
>>>> To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo at intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at
>>>> intel.com>
>>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stable at dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: RE: RE: [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return value
>>>>
>>>> OK, but I think this bug affects all stable release about 6 years before today.
>>
>>> I don't think so, since it is PMD internal ops, the real API 'rte_flow_ops_get'
>>> always use RTE_ETH_FILTER_GENERIC. ;-)
>>
>> eth_igb_filter_ctrl() called by rte_eth_dev_filter_ctrl(), if application developer
>> know how to use the parameter filter_type correctly, it's OK.
>> otherwise he will get rte_eth_dev_filter_ctrl() return value is success but
>> actually is failed.
> 
> After check with Haiyue, we think the patch is still needed for LTS <= 19.11, so
> 
> Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> 
> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
> 

What is the status of this patch?
It seems it did not applied, and the status in the patchwork is "Superseded".


More information about the stable mailing list