19.11.11 patches review and test

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 12/14/2021 11:39 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:13 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/14/2021 7:44 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:49 AM Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
>>> <kalesh-anakkur.purayil at broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>>>> [Kalesh] Yes, i am seeing the same error. I used make command to build dpdk, not meson.
>>>>>> The back ported commit you mentioned takes care of meson build only I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see, make build is failing, and yes the fix is only for the meson.
>>>>> I will check the make build and will send a fix for it.
>>>>
>>>> [Kalesh]: looks like the below changes fixes the issue. I tried only on SLES15 SP3 and not on other SLES flavors.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/linux/kni/Makefile b/kernel/linux/kni/Makefile
>>>> index 595bac2..bf0efab 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/linux/kni/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/kernel/linux/kni/Makefile
>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ MODULE_CFLAGS += -I$(RTE_OUTPUT)/include
>>>>    MODULE_CFLAGS += -include $(RTE_OUTPUT)/include/rte_config.h
>>>>    MODULE_CFLAGS += -Wall -Werror
>>>>
>>>> +#
>>>> +# Use explicit 'source' folder for header path. In SUSE 'source' is not linked to 'build' folder.
>>>> +#
>>>> +ifdef CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL
>>>> +   KSRC = /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/source
>>>> +   ifneq ($(shell grep -A 1 "ndo_tx_timeout" $(KSRC)/include/linux/netdevice.h | grep -o txqueue),)
>>>> +      MODULE_CFLAGS += -DHAVE_TX_TIMEOUT_TXQUEUE
>>>> +   endif
>>>> +endif
>>>
>>> Back in the day we tried various "is Suse and kernel version x.y"
>>> approaches, but they failed as there was no clear version throughout
>>> all of the Suse streams (leap, tumbleweed, sles) that worked well for
>>> all.
>>> This change here follows the upstream approach of "just check if it is there".
>>>
>>> I've applied this to 19.11 and did test builds across various distributions:
>>> 1. no non-suse build changed
>>> 2. suse builds stayed as-is or improved
>>> Formerly failing:
>>>      openSUSE_Factory_ARM aarch64
>>>      SLE_15  x86_64 -> now working
>>>      openSUSE_Leap_15.3 x86_64 -> now working
>>>      openSUSE_Tumbleweed  x86_64 -> still failing
>>> Formerly working:
>>>      SLE_12_SP4 x86_64 ppc64le -> still fine
>>>      openSUSE_Factory_ARM armv7l  -> still fine
>>>      openSUSE_Leap_15.2 x86_64  -> still fine
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Kalesh for the fix, and thanks Christian for testing.
>>
>> I was expecting this approach will fix all builds, after patch only
>> 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' is failing, right? I will check it.
> 
> As just discussed on IRC, yes and the log for that is at
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:cpaelzer:branches:home:bluca:dpdk/dpdk-19.11/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64
> 
> It also is affected by an issue around  -Werror=implicit-fallthrough,
> so even with KNI fixed it likely is going to fail.
> 
>> And I think you need the fix as a patch anyway, @Kalesh are you
>> planning to send the patch?
> 
> I don't need it, as I have already grabbed and preliminary added it:
> https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commit/d43fa3e198c08a3a76d70f4565b31ad3ab5f29c4
> 

I was thinking any commit in the LTS *must* come from either upstream
commit or a backport patch in the stable mail list.

Isn't it very hard to back trace merging diffs from emails,
are you OK with that?

> But surely, once/If you come up with a full patch that also includes
> tumbleweed I can replace it with yours.
> 
>>> Past fixes always "inverted" the result, by fixing some but breaking others.
>>> This new patch works in "not breaking any formerly working build" but
>>> at the same time fixing a few builds.
>>> Therefore -> applied & thanks!
>>>
>>> I'll likely tag -rc2 before the end of the week.
>>> The good thing is that (so far) we have:
>>> 1. a non functional change
>>> 2. a change fixing clang-13 builds (TBH only one of many needed clang13 issues)
>>> 3. a change fixing sles15SP3 builds
>>>
>>> Due to those, no current ongoing tests will have to be restarted.
>>> Whoever was able to build, can continue the current tests.
>>> Whoever was blocked by SLES15SP3 or clang-13 had no tests other than a
>>> failing build and can work with -rc2 then.
>>> I'll explain the same in the mail about -rc2.
>>>
>>>>    -include /etc/lsb-release
>>>>
>>>>    ifeq ($(DISTRIB_ID),Ubuntu)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Kalesh
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>
> 
>