19.11.11 (RC2) patches review and test

Ali Alnubani alialnu at nvidia.com
Thu Dec 30 14:47:06 CET 2021


> -----Original Message-----
> From: christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com
> <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 10:00 AM
> To: stable at dpdk.org
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>;
> Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>;
> benjamin.walker at intel.com; David Christensen <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Ian Stokes
> <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; John McNamara
> <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>;
> Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>;
> Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>; pingx.yu at intel.com;
> qian.q.xu at intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; NBU-
> Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas at monjalon.net>;
> yuan.peng at intel.com; zhaoyan.chen at intel.com
> Subject: 19.11.11 (RC2) patches review and test
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.11.
> 
> The planned date for the final release is 7th January 2021.
> 
> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> 
> This -rc2 is supposed to be functionally equivalent to the -rc1 version
> we had 11 days ago. The only fixes added since v19.11.11-rc1 are for
> typos (in comments) and to fix compilation issues on some kernels
> and newer toolchains. We still can't build everything with clang13 (19.11
> never built there, this is not a regression), but various issues blocking
> that are resolved already. The issues with SLES15 kernels are resolved as
> well as using LTO with gcc 10 is fixed.
> 
> Therefore there is no strict need to rerun all tests on -rc2 - OTOH by all
> means if you have the time and capacity I'd absolutely appreciate if
> you could do so.
> What is important and should be tested are various builds, to ensure that
> none of these changes broke a build for those target platforms that worked
> before.
> And furthermore - if before you had further functional tests blocked by
> those build issues - then now you can build and run those further tests
> that were formerly blocked.
> 
> List of fixed bugs since -rc1:
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908
> - Build on FreeBSD 13 (had no bug number)
> 
> Known and still remaining are:
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912
> 
> For everyone helping to fix so many of them already, thank you a lot!
> Maybe not on 19.11.11, if the joint efforts continue maybe 19.11.12
> will be able to resolve all these issues that are currently left.
> So keep the patches coming. Even after 19.11.11 is released I'll continue
> to enqueue your build fixes and since we just extended the lifetime of 19.11
> to three years there will be a 19.11.12 coming to pick them up.
> 

Hi,

The following covers the functional tests that we ran on Nvidia hardware for this release:
- Basic functionality:
  Send and receive multiple types of traffic.
- testpmd xstats counter test.
- testpmd timestamp test.
- Changing/checking link status through testpmd.
- RTE flow tests:
  Items: eth / ipv4 / ipv6 / tcp / udp / icmp / gre / nvgre / geneve / vxlan / mplsoudp / mplsogre
  Actions: drop / queue / rss / mark / flag / jump / count / raw_encap / raw_decap / vxlan_encap / vxlan_decap / NAT / dec_ttl
- Some RSS tests.
- VLAN filtering, stripping and insertion tests.
- Checksum and TSO tests.
- ptype tests.
- link_status_interrupt example application tests.
- l3fwd-power example application tests.
- Multi-process example applications tests.

Functional tests ran on:
- NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2 / Firmware: 14.32.1010
- NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Kernel: 5.16.0-rc7 / Driver: rdma-core v38.0 / Firmware: 14.32.1010
- NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2 / Firmware: 16.32.1010
- NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Kernel: 5.16.0-rc7 / Driver: v38.0 / Firmware: 16.32.1010

Compilation tests with multiple configurations in the following OS/driver combinations are also passing:
- Ubuntu 20.04.3 with MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2.
- Ubuntu 20.04.3 with rdma-core master (c52b43e).
- Ubuntu 20.04.3 with rdma-core v28.0.
- Ubuntu 18.04.6 with rdma-core v17.1.
- Ubuntu 18.04.6 with rdma-core master (c52b43e) (i386).
- Ubuntu 16.04.7 with rdma-core v22.7.
- Fedora 35 with rdma-core v38.0 (passing except for make builds with clang, see: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912).
- Fedora 36 (Rawhide) with rdma-core v38.0
- CentOS 7 7.9.2009 with rdma-core master (940f53f).
- CentOS 7 7.9.2009 with MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2.
- CentOS 8 8.4.2105 with rdma-core master (940f53f).
- OpenSUSE Leap 15.3 with rdma-core v31.0.

We don't see any other new issues in this release.

Thanks,
Ali


More information about the stable mailing list