[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2

[Kevin Traynor]

On 10/06/2021 11:05, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:05 AM Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:49 AM
>>> To: dpdk stable <stable at dpdk.org>
>>> Cc: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Abhishek Marathe
>>> <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>;
>>> Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
>>> <benjamin.walker at intel.com>; David Christensen
>>> <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
>>> <hariprasad.govindharajan at intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
>>> <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin
>>> Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnamara at intel.com>;
>>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
>>> <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>; Pei Zhang
>>> <pezhang at redhat.com>; Yu, PingX <pingx.yu at intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q
>>> <qian.q.xu at intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; NBU-
>>> Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan
>>> <yuan.peng at intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Christian Ehrhardt
>>> <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Here is version 2 of the list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.9.
>>>> Thanks to plenty of helpful developers we've collected a few more
>>>> backports by now and sorted out a few rare compile time issues that were
>>> found with -rc1.
>>>>
>>>> The planned date for the final release of 19.11.9 is now 18th of June.
>>>>
>>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
>>>> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
>>>> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
>>>>
>>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
>>>>
>>>>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.9-rc2
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there were further build issues with new suse kernels.
>>> The fix for some of them, now breaks others :-/ The final fix didn't finalize
>>> yet, but as a TL;DR it means there will be a -rc3 down the road.
>>>
>>> I beg your pardon for the extra work.
>>> If you are testing non-suse and are already deep into the tests you likely can
>>> continue that.
>>> If you didn't start your tests yet then I'd recommend holding back until -rc3
>>> exists.
>>>
>>
>> I see some build failures with gcc 11. Do we expect this release to support it?
> 
> I have added all that were targeted at stable at dpdk, but I remember
> that Kevin mentioned a few missing in 20.11.x due to the submissions
> missing to go to stable at dpdk.
> The same could be the case here.
> @Kevin could you have a look at 19.11 and if there are some missing
> point me to the commits to pick up?
> 
> @Ali - if you have a particular bug signature that might help to
> identify the right patch.
> 

They will all note 'GCC' (or gcc) in the commit msg. Most will have an
example of the 'warning' they resolved too. There was also bugzillas
opened for them all i think, which note the fixing commit. So if you
find any issues when building, you could cross-reference between warning
in commit/warning in Bz and fixing commit. Of course there may be some
new issues pop up in older code that was later changed/replaced in main.

There was also 2 commits needed for clang 12 support (my bad for missing
tags on these).
5ac070cfed test/cmdline: silence clang 12 warning
414245bbc5 test/cmdline: fix inputs array

>> I also see some doxygen errors with version 1.9.1 in Fedora Rawhide. Will open a Bugzilla ticket.
> 
> Rawhide builds of 19.11.x were broken for a while now, but yeah filing
> the bug surely is the right path.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ali
> 
> 
>