[dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2

[Ali Alnubani]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:59 PM
> To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> Cc: Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; dpdk stable <stable at dpdk.org>; dev
> <dev at dpdk.org>; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>;
> Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> <benjamin.walker at intel.com>; David Christensen
> <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> <hariprasad.govindharajan at intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin
> Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnamara at intel.com>;
> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>;
> Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>; Yu, PingX <pingx.yu at intel.com>; Xu,
> Qian Q <qian.q.xu at intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>;
> NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan
> <yuan.peng at intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2
> 
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:30 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/06/2021 11:05, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:05 AM Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Christian,
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>
> > >>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:49 AM
> > >>> To: dpdk stable <stable at dpdk.org>
> > >>> Cc: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Abhishek Marathe
> > >>> <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>; Akhil Goyal
> > >>> <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; Walker,
> > >>> Benjamin <benjamin.walker at intel.com>; David Christensen
> > >>> <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> > >>> <hariprasad.govindharajan at intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > >>> <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.stokes at intel.com>;
> Jerin
> > >>> Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; John McNamara
> > >>> <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
> <juhlee at microsoft.com>;
> > >>> Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > >>> <bluca at debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>; Yu, PingX
> > >>> <pingx.yu at intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu at intel.com>; Raslan
> > >>> Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; NBU- Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> > >>> <thomas at monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng at intel.com>; Chen,
> > >>> Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
> > >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Christian Ehrhardt
> > >>> <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Here is version 2 of the list of patches targeted for stable release
> 19.11.9.
> > >>>> Thanks to plenty of helpful developers we've collected a few more
> > >>>> backports by now and sorted out a few rare compile time issues
> > >>>> that were
> > >>> found with -rc1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The planned date for the final release of 19.11.9 is now 18th of June.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and
> > >>>> report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the
> > >>>> final release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the
> release notes.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.9-rc2
> > >>>
> > >>> Unfortunately there were further build issues with new suse kernels.
> > >>> The fix for some of them, now breaks others :-/ The final fix
> > >>> didn't finalize yet, but as a TL;DR it means there will be a -rc3 down the
> road.
> > >>>
> > >>> I beg your pardon for the extra work.
> > >>> If you are testing non-suse and are already deep into the tests
> > >>> you likely can continue that.
> > >>> If you didn't start your tests yet then I'd recommend holding back
> > >>> until -rc3 exists.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I see some build failures with gcc 11. Do we expect this release to
> support it?
> > >
> > > I have added all that were targeted at stable at dpdk, but I remember
> > > that Kevin mentioned a few missing in 20.11.x due to the submissions
> > > missing to go to stable at dpdk.
> > > The same could be the case here.
> > > @Kevin could you have a look at 19.11 and if there are some missing
> > > point me to the commits to pick up?
> > >
> > > @Ali - if you have a particular bug signature that might help to
> > > identify the right patch.
> > >
> >
> > They will all note 'GCC' (or gcc) in the commit msg. Most will have an
> > example of the 'warning' they resolved too. There was also bugzillas
> > opened for them all i think, which note the fixing commit. So if you
> > find any issues when building, you could cross-reference between
> > warning in commit/warning in Bz and fixing commit. Of course there may
> > be some new issues pop up in older code that was later changed/replaced
> in main.
> >
> > There was also 2 commits needed for clang 12 support (my bad for
> > missing tags on these).
> > 5ac070cfed test/cmdline: silence clang 12 warning
> > 414245bbc5 test/cmdline: fix inputs array
> 
> 
> Compiler patches in main:
> 
> I've rechecked all those to see why they were missing (if they did) to find if
> anything else is missing as well.
> 
> GCC:
> 71acf81bf7 doc: add GCC 11 and clang 12 support to release notes
>   - not targetted at stable (ok to be missing)
> 50eea2bfa7 test: fix build with GCC 11
>  - this got all missed due to the same problem Xueming had reported
> 099db3d156 crypto/zuc: fix build with GCC 11
>  - fixed code is only in 20.05
> 8f73a72378 test/crypto: fix build with GCC 11 33c12ac5ba test/table: fix build
> with GCC 11 a625ab89df net/tap: fix build with GCC 11 97de3819ed
> net/ice/base: fix build with GCC 11 ab70be7e2d net/bnx2x: fix build with GCC
> 11
> b3c740e037 net/bnx2x: fix build with GCC 11
>  - these got all missed due to the same problem Xueming had reported
> 8e2dd74f0a acl: fix build with GCC 11
>   - I've seen this one but it fixes code that is only in 20.11
> 
> Clang:
> 5ac070cfed test/cmdline: silence clang 12 warning
> 414245bbc5 test/cmdline: fix inputs array
> 
> Those two just were not tagged, that is fine and they will be added this
> round.
> 
> I was able to identify quite a few more affected by the same issue So I thank
> you a lot for pushing on this!

Here is also a list of the tickets related to gcc 11 which were resolved in 21.05:
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714

> 
> > >> I also see some doxygen errors with version 1.9.1 in Fedora Rawhide.
> Will open a Bugzilla ticket.
> > >
> > > Rawhide builds of 19.11.x were broken for a while now, but yeah
> > > filing the bug surely is the right path.

My mistake, it's actually warnings, not errors. Ticket:
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730

Thanks,
Ali