[dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] table: fix typo

[Dumitrescu, Cristian]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 5:15 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>; Thierry Herbelot
> <thierry.herbelot at 6wind.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] table: fix typo
> 
> 21/06/2021 17:54, Thierry Herbelot:
> > On 6/21/21 5:44 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> > > From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot at 6wind.com>
> > >> On 6/17/21 9:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >>>>> Check Bucket key for all possible indices.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Fixes: d0a00966618ba ("table: add exact match SWX table")
> > >>>>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > >>>>> Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot at 6wind.com>
> > >>> [...]
> > >>>>> -	return (!bkt->sig[0] && !bkt->sig[1] && !bkt->sig[2] && !bkt-
> >sig[2])
> > >>>>> +	return (!bkt->sig[0] && !bkt->sig[1] && !bkt->sig[2] && !bkt-
> >sig[3])
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thierry, thanks again, you could have actually added my ack from V1
> :)
> > >>>
> > >>> The root cause looks to be a typo indeed,
> > >>> but the impact or the scope of the issue
> > >>> should stated in few words in the title please.
> > >>> No need to send a v3, please suggest a title and I will apply.
> > >>
> > >> table: check a bucket is empty for all bucket keys
> > >>
> > >> 	Thierry
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hi Thierry,
> > >
> > > I think Thomas is asking for you to send a new version of this patch with
> the title updated. Is this OK with you?
> 
> No need to send a v3.
> >

OK, so you're going to fix the title while applying? Thanks, Thomas.


> > Hello Cristian
> >
> > Sure !
> >
> > What do you think of this title:
> >
> > "table: check a bucket is empty for all bucket keys"
> 
> This title suggests it was not the intent before.
> It should say that it fixes this check,
> or better, name the area of the API which is fixed.
>