[PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"

YE Chengfeng cyeaa at connect.ust.hk
Thu Nov 11 19:31:11 CET 2021
Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"
Next message (by thread): 回复: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Got it.

获取 Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
发件人: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>
发送时间: Friday, November 12, 2021 12:47:04 AM
收件人: YE Chengfeng <cyeaa at connect.ust.hk>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org <dev at dpdk.org>
抄送: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; stable at dpdk.org <stable at dpdk.org>
主题: RE: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"


From: YE Chengfeng <cyeaa at connect.ust.hk>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 18:08
To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; stable at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"



No problem, I will send the new patch.

[SO] Thank you.



But what about the commit message and title, should I use the previous one?

net/mlx5: fix mutex unlock in txpp cleanup

[SO] Please,  send as the next version (v6?) of your patch. Just squash my proposals
and keep your title (“net/mlx5: fix mutex unlock in txpp cleanup”) and commit message.



With best regards,
Slava







获取 Outlook for iOS<https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fo0ukef&data=04%7C01%7Ccyeaa%40connect.ust.hk%7Cb054bd8f8f3c42e1f0bb08d9a532e5d5%7C6c1d415239d044ca88d9b8d6ddca0708%7C1%7C0%7C637722460307163598%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=3v%2BIAEdHSfsB%2BEoAmKldFqybeHCC3ihLZ6HSnWzkTD0%3D&reserved=0>

________________________________

发件人: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com<mailto:viacheslavo at nvidia.com>>
发送时间: Thursday, November 11, 2021 8:27:30 PM
收件人: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com<mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com>>; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org> <dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>>
抄送: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com<mailto:rasland at nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com<mailto:matan at nvidia.com>>; stable at dpdk.org<mailto:stable at dpdk.org> <stable at dpdk.org<mailto:stable at dpdk.org>>; YE Chengfeng <cyeaa at connect.ust.hk<mailto:cyeaa at connect.ust.hk>>
主题: RE: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"



Hi, Ferruh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com<mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com>>
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 14:08
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com<mailto:viacheslavo at nvidia.com>>; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com<mailto:rasland at nvidia.com>>; Matan Azrad
> <matan at nvidia.com<mailto:matan at nvidia.com>>; stable at dpdk.org<mailto:stable at dpdk.org>; Chengfeng Ye
> <cyeaa at connect.ust.hk<mailto:cyeaa at connect.ust.hk>>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"
>
> On 11/11/2021 8:59 AM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote:
> > Hi, Ferruh
> >
> > I've also inspected the mlx5 PMD code for RTE_SET_USED() for the
> > similar issues related to the MLX5_ASSERT().
> >
> > The patch
> > https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatches.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F20211111084751.26721-1-&data=04%7C01%7Ccyeaa%40connect.ust.hk%7C87553a5cd43647db708008d9a50ea321%7C6c1d415239d044ca88d9b8d6ddca0708%7C1%7C0%7C637722304566828185%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=woTMghsE0S7ckoo0AI01YbdWrJeLtbMCu4GeE8JDiUc%3D&reserved=0<https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatches.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F20211111084751.26721-1-&data=04%7C01%7Ccyeaa%40connect.ust.hk%7Cb054bd8f8f3c42e1f0bb08d9a532e5d5%7C6c1d415239d044ca88d9b8d6ddca0708%7C1%7C0%7C637722460307173555%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=FH1BEOdaDn4vgLHJ%2BjV8DrH9kZIVCVpoVUEnPB2GHWw%3D&reserved=0>
> viac
> > heslavo at nvidia.com/<mailto:heslavo at nvidia.com/>
> > should refine the few found ones.
> >
> > I do not mind about squashing with "net/mlx5: fix mutex unlock in txpp
> cleanup"
> > After getting this code in Upstream will care about the version for LTS.
> >
>
> It will cause additional complexity for the LTS, since a small part of the below
> fix will be originated from Chengfeng's change. To help LTS, what do you think
> - First get your fix on top of current task
> - Have a new version from Chengfeng on top of latest head, with 'claim_zero'
> usage?
Would be nice, I have no any objections.
Chengfeng, could you please, squash (or write by yourself) my proposed updates
and send the next version of your patch with "claim_zero()"?

> So only your update need to be merged to LTS releases.
Yes, agree, it is even better than my proposal.

With best regards,
Slava

> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com<mailto:viacheslavo at nvidia.com>>
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 10:48
> >> To: dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> >> Cc: ferruh.yigit at intel.com<mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com<mailto:rasland at nvidia.com>>;
> >> Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com<mailto:matan at nvidia.com>>; stable at dpdk.org<mailto:stable at dpdk.org>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"
> >>
> >> The patch just refines the code and replaces the pairs of
> >> MLX5_ASSERT() and
> >> RTE_SET_USED() with equivalent claim_zero().
> >>
> >> Cc: stable at dpdk.org<mailto:stable at dpdk.org>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com<mailto:viacheslavo at nvidia.com>>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
> >>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c
> >> b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c index 73626f0e8f..af77e91e4c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c
> >> @@ -890,7 +890,6 @@ mlx5_txpp_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >>     struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> >>     struct mlx5_dev_ctx_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >>     int err = 0;
> >> -  int ret;
> >>
> >>     if (!priv->config.tx_pp) {
> >>             /* Packet pacing is not requested for the device. */ @@ -
> >> 903,14 +902,14 @@ mlx5_txpp_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >>             return 0;
> >>     }
> >>     if (priv->config.tx_pp > 0) {
> >> -          ret = rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup
> >> -
> >>     (RTE_MBUF_DYNFLAG_TX_TIMESTAMP_NAME, NULL);
> >> -          if (ret < 0)
> >> +          err = rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup
> >> +                  (RTE_MBUF_DYNFLAG_TX_TIMESTAMP_NAME,
> >> NULL);
> >> +          /* No flag registered means no service needed. */
> >> +          if (err < 0)
> >>                     return 0;
> >> +          err = 0;
> >>     }
> >> -  ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&sh->txpp.mutex);
> >> -  MLX5_ASSERT(!ret);
> >> -  RTE_SET_USED(ret);
> >> +  claim_zero(pthread_mutex_lock(&sh->txpp.mutex));
> >>     if (sh->txpp.refcnt) {
> >>             priv->txpp_en = 1;
> >>             ++sh->txpp.refcnt;
> >> @@ -924,9 +923,7 @@ mlx5_txpp_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >>                     rte_errno = -err;
> >>             }
> >>     }
> >> -  ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex);
> >> -  MLX5_ASSERT(!ret);
> >> -  RTE_SET_USED(ret);
> >> +  claim_zero(pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex));
> >>     return err;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> @@ -944,28 +941,21 @@ mlx5_txpp_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)  {
> >>     struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> >>     struct mlx5_dev_ctx_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >> -  int ret;
> >>
> >>     if (!priv->txpp_en) {
> >>             /* Packet pacing is already disabled for the device. */
> >>             return;
> >>     }
> >>     priv->txpp_en = 0;
> >> -  ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&sh->txpp.mutex);
> >> -  MLX5_ASSERT(!ret);
> >> -  RTE_SET_USED(ret);
> >> +  claim_zero(pthread_mutex_lock(&sh->txpp.mutex));
> >>     MLX5_ASSERT(sh->txpp.refcnt);
> >>     if (!sh->txpp.refcnt || --sh->txpp.refcnt) {
> >> -          ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex);
> >> -          MLX5_ASSERT(!ret);
> >> -          RTE_SET_USED(ret);
> >> +          claim_zero(pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex));
> >>             return;
> >>     }
> >>     /* No references any more, do actual destroy. */
> >>     mlx5_txpp_destroy(sh);
> >> -  ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex);
> >> -  MLX5_ASSERT(!ret);
> >> -  RTE_SET_USED(ret);
> >> +  claim_zero(pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex));
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   /*
> >> --
> >> 2.18.1
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/attachments/20211111/a4d2311b/attachment.htm>
Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"
Next message (by thread): 回复: [PATCH] net/mlx5: remove redundant "set used"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the stable mailing list