patch 'mbuf: enforce no option for dynamic fields and flags' has been queued to stable release 19.11.11

christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com
Tue Nov 30 17:34:32 CET 2021


Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.11

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before December 10th 2021. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue

This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commit/2ff1b965f5bf8a73fe37c312c6a473313f3a10cb

Thanks.

Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>

---
>From 2ff1b965f5bf8a73fe37c312c6a473313f3a10cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:39:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: enforce no option for dynamic fields and flags

[ upstream commit e9123c467dbb471a2d41ea896423a81886ef89d7 ]

As stated in the API, dynamic field and flags should be created with no
additional flag (simply in the API for future changes).

Fix the dynamic flag register helper which was not enforcing it and add
unit tests.

Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
Acked-by: Ray Kinsella <mdr at ashroe.eu>
---
 app/test/test_mbuf.c           | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
index 3224272eaa..709a919682 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
@@ -2444,6 +2444,16 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 		.align = 3,
 		.flags = 0,
 	};
+	const struct rte_mbuf_dynfield dynfield_fail_flag = {
+		.name = "test-dynfield",
+		.size = sizeof(uint8_t),
+		.align = __alignof__(uint8_t),
+		.flags = 1,
+	};
+	const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag dynflag_fail_flag = {
+		.name = "test-dynflag",
+		.flags = 1,
+	};
 	const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag dynflag = {
 		.name = "test-dynflag",
 		.flags = 0,
@@ -2505,6 +2515,14 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 	if (ret != -1)
 		GOTO_FAIL("dynamic field creation should fail (not avail)");
 
+	ret = rte_mbuf_dynfield_register(&dynfield_fail_flag);
+	if (ret != -1)
+		GOTO_FAIL("dynamic field creation should fail (invalid flag)");
+
+	ret = rte_mbuf_dynflag_register(&dynflag_fail_flag);
+	if (ret != -1)
+		GOTO_FAIL("dynamic flag creation should fail (invalid flag)");
+
 	flag = rte_mbuf_dynflag_register(&dynflag);
 	if (flag == -1)
 		GOTO_FAIL("failed to register dynamic flag, flag=%d: %s",
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
index a9a8834d4c..4ef50d3f82 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
@@ -497,6 +497,10 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_register_bitnum(const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag *params,
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	if (params->flags != 0) {
+		rte_errno = EINVAL;
+		return -1;
+	}
 	if (req >= RTE_SIZEOF_FIELD(struct rte_mbuf, ol_flags) * CHAR_BIT &&
 			req != UINT_MAX) {
 		rte_errno = EINVAL;
-- 
2.34.0

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2021-11-30 16:50:09.910533037 +0100
+++ 0068-mbuf-enforce-no-option-for-dynamic-fields-and-flags.patch	2021-11-30 16:50:05.742873178 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From e9123c467dbb471a2d41ea896423a81886ef89d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 2ff1b965f5bf8a73fe37c312c6a473313f3a10cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+[ upstream commit e9123c467dbb471a2d41ea896423a81886ef89d7 ]
+
@@ -19,2 +21,2 @@
- app/test/test_mbuf.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
- lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c |  4 ++++
+ app/test/test_mbuf.c           | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
+ lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c |  4 ++++
@@ -24 +26 @@
-index 9a248dfaea..82777109dc 100644
+index 3224272eaa..709a919682 100644
@@ -27 +29 @@
-@@ -2577,6 +2577,16 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
+@@ -2444,6 +2444,16 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
@@ -44 +46 @@
-@@ -2638,6 +2648,14 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
+@@ -2505,6 +2515,14 @@ test_mbuf_dyn(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
@@ -59,5 +61,5 @@
-diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
-index ca46eb279e..d55e162a68 100644
---- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
-+++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
-@@ -498,6 +498,10 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_register_bitnum(const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag *params,
+diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
+index a9a8834d4c..4ef50d3f82 100644
+--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
++++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
+@@ -497,6 +497,10 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_register_bitnum(const struct rte_mbuf_dynflag *params,


More information about the stable mailing list