[dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/ice: fix representor port segmentation fault
Wang, Haiyue
haiyue.wang at intel.com
Thu Sep 2 16:45:20 CEST 2021
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yu, DapengX <dapengx.yu at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 17:44
> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at intel.com>; Yu, DapengX <dapengx.yu at intel.com>;
> stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/ice: fix representor port segmentation fault
>
> From: Dapeng Yu <dapengx.yu at intel.com>
>
> If DCF representor port is closed after DCF port is closed, there will
> be segmentation fault because representor accesses the released resource
> of DCF port.
>
> This patch makes DCF representor port is always closed before DCF port is
> closed.
>
> Fixes: 5674465a32c8 ("net/ice: add DCF VLAN handling")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Yu <dapengx.yu at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_vf_representor.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.c
> index cab7c4da87..b837f69fd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.c
> @@ -874,6 +874,7 @@ ice_dcf_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> return 0;
>
> + ice_dcf_vf_repr_close_all(adapter);
> ice_dcf_free_repr_info(adapter);
> ice_dcf_uninit_parent_adapter(dev);
> ice_dcf_uninit_hw(dev, &adapter->real_hw);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.h
> index 8510e37119..9e8d3ef0c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.h
> @@ -64,5 +64,6 @@ int ice_dcf_vf_repr_init(struct rte_eth_dev *vf_rep_eth_dev, void *init_param);
> int ice_dcf_vf_repr_uninit(struct rte_eth_dev *vf_rep_eth_dev);
> int ice_dcf_vf_repr_init_vlan(struct rte_eth_dev *vf_rep_eth_dev);
> void ice_dcf_vf_repr_stop_all(struct ice_dcf_adapter *dcf_adapter);
> +void ice_dcf_vf_repr_close_all(struct ice_dcf_adapter *dcf_adapter);
>
> #endif /* _ICE_DCF_ETHDEV_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_vf_representor.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_vf_representor.c
> index 970461f3e9..121dea7483 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_vf_representor.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_dcf_vf_representor.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int
> ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> dev->data->dev_link.link_status = ETH_LINK_DOWN;
> + dev->data->dev_started = 0;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> static int
> ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> + (void)ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_stop(dev);
Do we truly need the "(void)" ?
> return ice_dcf_vf_repr_uninit(dev);
> }
>
> @@ -464,7 +466,6 @@ void
> ice_dcf_vf_repr_stop_all(struct ice_dcf_adapter *dcf_adapter)
> {
> uint16_t vf_id;
> - int ret;
>
> if (!dcf_adapter->repr_infos)
> return;
> @@ -475,8 +476,25 @@ ice_dcf_vf_repr_stop_all(struct ice_dcf_adapter *dcf_adapter)
> if (!vf_rep_eth_dev || vf_rep_eth_dev->data->dev_started == 0)
> continue;
>
> - ret = ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_stop(vf_rep_eth_dev);
> - if (!ret)
> - vf_rep_eth_dev->data->dev_started = 0;
> + (void)ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_stop(vf_rep_eth_dev);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +ice_dcf_vf_repr_close_all(struct ice_dcf_adapter *dcf_adapter)
> +{
> + uint16_t vf_id;
> +
> + if (!dcf_adapter->repr_infos)
> + return;
> +
> + for (vf_id = 0; vf_id < dcf_adapter->real_hw.num_vfs; vf_id++) {
> + struct rte_eth_dev *vf_rep_eth_dev =
> + dcf_adapter->repr_infos[vf_id].vf_rep_eth_dev;
> + if (!vf_rep_eth_dev)
> + continue;
> +
> + (void)ice_dcf_vf_repr_dev_close(vf_rep_eth_dev);
> + (void)rte_eth_dev_release_port(vf_rep_eth_dev);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
More information about the stable
mailing list