[PATCH] mbuf: expose outer vlan in mbuf dump

[Olivier Matz]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 05:51:05PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 04/04/2022 12:33, Kevin Traynor:
> > On 04/04/2022 07:15, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > >> From: Ben Magistro [mailto:koncept1 at gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Monday, 4 April 2022 02.57
> > >>
> > >> Enable printing of the outer vlan if flags indicate it is present.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <koncept1 at gmail.com>

Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>

> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> While troubleshooting some QinQ offloads with various Intel i40e
> > >> firmware[1], it was
> > >> helpful to expose the outer vlan in the dump mbuf calls.  This should
> > >> be straightforward
> > >> to backport and happy to do the work if accepted. I understand that
> > >> this may not be a
> > >> widely supported capability at this time, so we are okay if this is not
> > >> accepted and
> > >> we just maintain a local patch.
> > > 
> > > Features are usually not backported, only bug fixes.
> > > 
> > > However, since this patch proved helpful finding a bug, and it is very simple, it could be considered by the LTS maintainers.
> > 
> > 
> > Suggest to tag the patch with 'Cc: stable at dpdk.org' to indicate it is 
> > requested for stable branches. It will be caught by stable maintainer 
> > filters when it is time for backports and can be discussed further then.
> 
> I think it is a bug.
> What was introduced first? the function or the field?
> Please find the commit where it should have been done
> and mark it with "Fixes:" syntax + Cc:stable.

The vlan dump was introduced by commit 5b6eaea8ea7c ("mbuf: display more
fields in dump"), but I don't think we can say it's a bug. To me, it is
an enhancement that could be backported, because there is a benefit with
a very low risk.