[EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] drivers: fix symbol exports when map is omitted

[Patrick Robb]

Thomas - thanks for the response. We will proceed with making the necessary
changes for using v22.11.1.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:22 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:

> I'm sorry Patrick that it gives you more work.
> Your proposals below don't look possible because a tag is something fixed
> forever.
> We had an ABI issue in the initial tag so we cannot use the tag v22.11 as
> planned.
> I don't see how we can better plan except having more tests on release
> candidates.
>
>
> 07/12/2022 19:00, Patrick Robb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Community Lab team members are wondering whether it is possible to bump
> > v22.11 to include at least this patch. We have an existing codebase which
> > relies on a vXX.XX scheme for producing ABI references. We parse that out
> > at different places in our code, so fixing this to handle vXX.XX.X will
> > require some changes on our end. We can do that, but it puts the timeline
> > on turning on ABI testing at the community lab back some. A v22.11 tagged
> > release with this patch would allow for us to turn on ABI testing
> > immediately. There was also a suggestion that having the "base" tag (like
> > the simple v22.11) point to the latest revision is a more standard
> version
> > naming approach and may be more intuitive than what is being used
> currently.
> >
> > If that is not possible, we will update our code to be able to refer to a
> > vXX.XX.X tag for producing the ABI reference. If we adopt this approach,
> we
> > would like to request that with future releases, a "vXX.XX.0" tag could
> > always be made available for us to produce ABI references from. That way,
> > we can prepare for turning on ABI testing knowing beforehand the tag name
> > we will be using.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:25 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at amd.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/6/2022 10:18 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:13 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at amd.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> On 12/5/2022 3:37 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > >>> 05/12/2022 14:47, Akhil Goyal:
> > > >>>> But adding a tag on same repo is more convenient from developer
> point
> > > of view.
> > > >>>> However, it is my personal view, others may differ.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> From developer point of view, you should use
> > > devtools/test-meson-builds.sh
> > > >>> which does the "git clone" for you.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is what I have in ~/.config/dpdk/devel.config
> > > >>> export DPDK_ABI_REF_DIR=$root/dpdk-build/abiref
> > > >>> export DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v22.11.1
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Does it help to update 'test-meson-builds.sh' to use an environment
> > > >> variable to select which repo to clone?
> > > >> If so, I can send a patch for it.
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering too...
> > > > I would expect most maintainers have the stable repo in their config
> > > > but it would not hurt to handle the case when they don't for others.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > >
> > > Sent following if it helps:
> > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=26015
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Patrick Robb

Technical Service Manager

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

www.iol.unh.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/attachments/20221208/2026a60c/attachment.htm>