patch 'net/sfc: fix lock releases' has been queued to stable release 21.11.1

Kevin Traynor ktraynor at redhat.com
Mon Feb 21 16:35:31 CET 2022


Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 21.11.1

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 02/26/22. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable

This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable/commit/eaf935f63c42ebd8dcf63b999ae7c0f48c3b2d53

Thanks.

Kevin

---
>From eaf935f63c42ebd8dcf63b999ae7c0f48c3b2d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:15:59 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] net/sfc: fix lock releases

[ upstream commit 1542d303a7c0127a7748881f7cb689983614ee43 ]

Fixes: 155583abe63c ("net/sfc: implement representor queue setup and release")
Fixes: 75f080fdf74a ("net/sfc: implement port representor start and stop")

Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c
index 535b07ea52..8660d419a3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_repr_proxy.c
@@ -1414,4 +1414,5 @@ sfc_repr_proxy_add_rxq(uint16_t pf_port_id, uint16_t repr_id,
 	if (port == NULL) {
 		sfc_err(sa, "%s() failed: no such port", __func__);
+		sfc_put_adapter(sa);
 		return ENOENT;
 	}
@@ -1452,4 +1453,5 @@ sfc_repr_proxy_del_rxq(uint16_t pf_port_id, uint16_t repr_id,
 	if (port == NULL) {
 		sfc_err(sa, "%s() failed: no such port", __func__);
+		sfc_put_adapter(sa);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1485,4 +1487,5 @@ sfc_repr_proxy_add_txq(uint16_t pf_port_id, uint16_t repr_id,
 	if (port == NULL) {
 		sfc_err(sa, "%s() failed: no such port", __func__);
+		sfc_put_adapter(sa);
 		return ENOENT;
 	}
@@ -1517,4 +1520,5 @@ sfc_repr_proxy_del_txq(uint16_t pf_port_id, uint16_t repr_id,
 	if (port == NULL) {
 		sfc_err(sa, "%s() failed: no such port", __func__);
+		sfc_put_adapter(sa);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1615,4 +1619,5 @@ sfc_repr_proxy_stop_repr(uint16_t pf_port_id, uint16_t repr_id)
 	if (port == NULL) {
 		sfc_err(sa, "%s() failed: no such port", __func__);
+		sfc_put_adapter(sa);
 		return ENOENT;
 	}
-- 
2.34.1

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2022-02-21 15:22:47.677270047 +0000
+++ 0142-net-sfc-fix-lock-releases.patch	2022-02-21 15:22:44.298704592 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From 1542d303a7c0127a7748881f7cb689983614ee43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From eaf935f63c42ebd8dcf63b999ae7c0f48c3b2d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+[ upstream commit 1542d303a7c0127a7748881f7cb689983614ee43 ]
+
@@ -8 +9,0 @@
-Cc: stable at dpdk.org



More information about the stable mailing list