[PATCH v2] net/tap: fix to populate fds in secondary process

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 1/28/2022 9:55 AM, kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel wrote:
>  > +static int
>  > +tap_mp_req_start_rxtx(const struct rte_mp_msg *request, __rte_unused const void *peer)
>  > +{
> 
> I asked last time but I don't remember the response,
> what should be in the 'peer' variable?
> The peer variable is currently unused. The primary does not expect any response from secondary processes. Should we change the model to rte_mp_request_sync rather than rte_mp_send_msg?

No need to change,
I asked because I wasn't clear what 'peer' is for, as checked,
it is the address of the sender which is used to reply, so not
useful in this case.