patch 'examples/qos_sched: fix core mask overflow' has been queued to stable release 20.11.5
Ajmera, Megha
megha.ajmera at intel.com
Tue Mar 1 19:29:17 CET 2022
Please go ahead and apply to the branch.
Regards,
Megha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: luca.boccassi at gmail.com <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2022 2:50 AM
> To: Ajmera, Megha <megha.ajmera at intel.com>
> Cc: Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>; dpdk stable
> <stable at dpdk.org>
> Subject: patch 'examples/qos_sched: fix core mask overflow' has been queued
> to stable release 20.11.5
>
> Hi,
>
> FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.5
>
> Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
> It will be pushed if I get no objections before 03/02/22. So please shout if
> anyone has objections.
>
> Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch
> applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to
> apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
> (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly
> done.
>
> Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
> https://github.com/bluca/dpdk-stable
>
> This queued commit can be viewed at:
> https://github.com/bluca/dpdk-
> stable/commit/a7aa7d8812abe4034027363036a0ec297574f49d
>
> Thanks.
>
> Luca Boccassi
>
> ---
> From a7aa7d8812abe4034027363036a0ec297574f49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Megha Ajmera <megha.ajmera at intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:36:30 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] examples/qos_sched: fix core mask overflow
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> [ upstream commit 9c9fad3dfa042ae4b7a045cb1731f8701f8210e6 ]
>
> Masking of core mask was incorrect. Instead of using 1U for shifting, it should
> be using 1LU as the result is assigned to uint64.
>
> CID 375859: Potentially overflowing expression "1U << app_main_core" with
> type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, and
> then used in a context that expects an expression of type "uint64_t" (64 bits,
> unsigned).
>
> Coverity issue: 375859
> Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
>
> Signed-off-by: Megha Ajmera <megha.ajmera at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>
> ---
> examples/qos_sched/args.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/qos_sched/args.c b/examples/qos_sched/args.c index
> c369ba9b4d..891cfb2809 100644
> --- a/examples/qos_sched/args.c
> +++ b/examples/qos_sched/args.c
> @@ -410,13 +410,13 @@ app_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
>
> /* check main core index validity */
> for (i = 0; i <= app_main_core; i++) {
> - if (app_used_core_mask & (1u << app_main_core)) {
> + if (app_used_core_mask & RTE_BIT64(app_main_core)) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, APP, "Main core index is not configured
> properly\n");
> app_usage(prgname);
> return -1;
> }
> }
> - app_used_core_mask |= 1u << app_main_core;
> + app_used_core_mask |= RTE_BIT64(app_main_core);
>
> if ((app_used_core_mask != app_eal_core_mask()) ||
> (app_main_core != rte_get_main_lcore())) {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> ---
> Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-
> empty:
> ---
> --- - 2022-02-28 21:17:55.022866035 +0000
> +++ 0013-examples-qos_sched-fix-core-mask-overflow.patch 2022-02-28
> 21:17:53.820928793 +0000
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -From 9c9fad3dfa042ae4b7a045cb1731f8701f8210e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> +From a7aa7d8812abe4034027363036a0ec297574f49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> @@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
> +[ upstream commit 9c9fad3dfa042ae4b7a045cb1731f8701f8210e6 ]
> +
> @@ -19 +20,0 @@
> -Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> @@ -28 +29 @@
> -index 10ca7bea61..b2959499ae 100644
> +index c369ba9b4d..891cfb2809 100644
> @@ -31 +32 @@
> -@@ -427,13 +427,13 @@ app_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
> +@@ -410,13 +410,13 @@ app_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
More information about the stable
mailing list