[PATCH 20.11 1/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix length and offset settings

[De Lara Guarch, Pablo]

Hi Kevin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 11:19 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>;
> luca.boccassi at gmail.com; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 20.11 1/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix length and offset settings
> 
> On 15/03/2022 11:10, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > Hi Pablo,
> >
> > On 14/03/2022 11:05, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> >> [ upstream commit a501609ea6466ed8526c0dfadedee332a4d4a451 ]
> >>
> >> KASUMI, SNOW3G and ZUC require lengths and offsets to be set in bits
> >> or bytes depending on the algorithm.
> >> There were some algorithms that were mixing these two, so this commit
> >> is fixing this issue.
> >>
> >> Fixes: ae8e085c608d ("crypto/aesni_mb: support KASUMI F8/F9")
> >> Fixes: 6c42e0cf4d12 ("crypto/aesni_mb: support SNOW3G-UEA2/UIA2")
> >> Fixes: fd8df85487c4 ("crypto/aesni_mb: support ZUC-EEA3/EIA3")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > For 21.11. I backported and applied a501609ea6466 from dpdk main
> > branch to 21.11 branch [0]. The version sent here directly to 20.11 is
> > quite different as it adds the 'switch (job->cipher_mode)'. (It feels
> > like some other patch adding 'switch (job->cipher_mode)' was missed
> > for
> > backported)
> >
> > As this switch is not in [0], the following GMAC patch [1] won't apply
> > for 21.11.
> >
> > One option is that you send a patch to just add the missing parts, and
> > then I apply the GMAC patch.
> >
> > But the simplest option is that I revert [0], apply updated 20.11
> > version + GMAC patch.
> >
> > I'll go with the latter option (assuming they apply cleanly), but
> > please let me know if that sounds ok.
> >
> 
> I just noticed Luca is reporting build failures. In that case, please send these 2
> patches rebased for 21.11 branch as well. If the same patches work for
> 20.11/21.11 you can indicate in the subject-prefix. I will revert [0] and apply
> those.
> 

I'll wait for the build issue on 20.11 to be resolved (I think it's system environment related),
but I think all we need is the second patch (crypto/ipsec_mb: fix GMAC parameters setting).
I can send it as soon as this is done.

Thanks,
Pablo

> > thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
> > [0]
> > http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=21.11&id=daf06c45e8576d8a2a8
> > 6455e33e2bc4574f8f8b4
> >
> > [1] 837269c2e5c5 ("crypto/ipsec_mb: fix GMAC parameters setting")
> >
> >