20.11.5 patches review and test

[Jiang, YuX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: luca.boccassi at gmail.com <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 11:21 PM
> To: stable at dpdk.org
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>;
> Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> <benjamin.walker at intel.com>; David Christensen
> <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; hariprasad.govindharajan at intel.com; Hemant
> Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com>;
> Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>;
> Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>;
> Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu at intel.com>;
> Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas at monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng at intel.com>; Chen,
> Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
> Subject: 20.11.5 patches review and test
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 20.11.5.
> 
> The planned date for the final release is the 4th of April.
> 
> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any
> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and
> reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> 
> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> 
>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v20.11.5-rc1
> 
> These patches are located at branch 20.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Luca Boccassi
> 
> ---
Hi Luca,

Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk20.11.5-rc1 test rate is 90%. Till now, no critical issue is found.
# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build&CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora35, RHEL8.4, etc.
- All test done. One bug https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=982, no fix yet.
* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. 
- Execution rate is 90%. No new issue is found. 
* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.		
- Execution rate is 90%. No new issue is found. 	
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
- Execution rate is 90%. No new issue is found. 
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss performance test, etc.
- All test done. No big performance drop.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
- All test passed.	
		
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc.
- All test done. Find 5 cbdma related defects, Intel dev is investigating them.
* Cryptodev: 
*Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
- All test passed.
*Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
- All test done.


Best regards,
Yu Jiang