[PATCH] doc: add eal_args.include to toctree

Kevin Traynor ktraynor at redhat.com
Thu Mar 31 18:29:59 CEST 2022


On 31/03/2022 14:51, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 02:26:54PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> A warning is observed on RHEL 8.4.
>>
>> [1/1] Generating html_guides with a custom command
>> /root/dpdk/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst:
>> WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree
>>
>> Add file to toctree to remove warning.
>>
>> Fixes: 3ee567cfec37 ("doc: document all EAL parameters in one place")
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   doc/guides/linux_gsg/index.rst | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/index.rst b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/index.rst
>> index 16a9a67260..cffa4998d8 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/index.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/index.rst
>> @@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ Getting Started Guide for Linux
>>       linux_drivers
>>       build_sample_apps
>> +    eal_args.include
>>       linux_eal_parameters
>>       enable_func
> 
> I think this is a false-positive warning, that shouldn't be fixed in this
> way. That file is not one to be put at the top level of the doc - instead
> it is included by both freesd and linux gsg guides within the relevant
> sections. If we can't suppress this warning, maybe we need to rename the
> file to not end with a .rst extension.
> 

Ok, it's not a big deal anyway, RHEL 8.4 is using an old version of 
sphinx (1.7.6). I can't reproduce on Fedora with a newer version (3.4.3) 
and no one else seems to see it.

I tried to remove the warning with :orphan: but I'm not sure it's that 
well supported in that version. Removing the .rst doesn't seem like the 
right thing either. I'm ok to live with the warning on older sphinx. 
Thanks for replying.

Kevin.

> /Bruce
> 



More information about the stable mailing list