[PATCH v3 3/5] raw/ifpga: unregister interrupt in ifpga close function

[Zhang, Tianfei]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huang, Wei <wei.huang at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 11:33 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas at monjalon.net; nipun.gupta at nxp.com;
> hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org; Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu at intel.com>; Zhang, Tianfei
> <tianfei.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Huang, Wei
> <wei.huang at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] raw/ifpga: unregister interrupt in ifpga close function
> 
> In original implementation, interrupts are unregistered in ifpga_rawdev_destroy
> function. If application want to release the ifpga driver resource by calling
> rte_rawdev_pmd_release, interrupt resource will not be released.
> Now interrupt unregistration is moved from ifpga destroy function to ifpga close
> function, when rte_rawdev_pmd_release is called, rte_rawdev_close will be
> called, then interrupts are unregistered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang at intel.com>
> ---
> v2: update commit log
> ---
>  drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
> b/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
> index fe3fc43..94df56c 100644
> --- a/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(  static int
> ifpga_pci_find_next_ext_capability(unsigned int fd,
>  					      int start, uint32_t cap);
>  static int ifpga_pci_find_ext_capability(unsigned int fd, uint32_t cap);
> +static void fme_interrupt_handler(void *param);
> 
>  struct ifpga_rawdev *
>  ifpga_rawdev_get(const struct rte_rawdev *rawdev) @@ -740,8 +741,9 @@
> static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(  {
>  	struct ifpga_rawdev *ifpga_rdev = NULL;
>  	struct opae_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct opae_manager *mgr;
>  	char *vdev_name = NULL;
> -	int i = 0;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> 
>  	if (dev) {
>  		ifpga_rdev = ifpga_rawdev_get(dev);
> @@ -756,12 +758,19 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
>  		}
>  		adapter = ifpga_rawdev_get_priv(dev);
>  		if (adapter) {
> +			mgr = opae_adapter_get_mgr(adapter);
> +			if (ifpga_rdev && mgr) {
> +				if (ifpga_unregister_msix_irq(ifpga_rdev,
> +					IFPGA_FME_IRQ, 0,
> +					fme_interrupt_handler, mgr) < 0)
> +					ret = -EINVAL;
> +			}
>  			opae_adapter_destroy(adapter);
>  			opae_adapter_data_free(adapter->data);
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> -	return dev ? 0:1;
> +	return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static int
> @@ -1629,9 +1638,6 @@ static int fme_clean_fme_error(struct opae_manager
> *mgr)
>  	int ret;
>  	struct rte_rawdev *rawdev;
>  	char name[RTE_RAWDEV_NAME_MAX_LEN];
> -	struct opae_adapter *adapter;
> -	struct opae_manager *mgr;
> -	struct ifpga_rawdev *dev;
> 
>  	if (!pci_dev) {
>  		IFPGA_RAWDEV_PMD_ERR("Invalid pci_dev of the device!");
> @@ -1651,19 +1657,6 @@ static int fme_clean_fme_error(struct
> opae_manager *mgr)
>  		IFPGA_RAWDEV_PMD_ERR("Invalid device name (%s)", name);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	dev = ifpga_rawdev_get(rawdev);
> -
> -	adapter = ifpga_rawdev_get_priv(rawdev);
> -	if (!adapter)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	mgr = opae_adapter_get_mgr(adapter);
> -	if (!mgr)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	if (ifpga_unregister_msix_irq(dev, IFPGA_FME_IRQ, 0,
> -				fme_interrupt_handler, mgr) < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> 
>  	/* rte_rawdev_close is called by pmd_release */
>  	ret = rte_rawdev_pmd_release(rawdev);
> --

Hi Wei,
It looks good for me, you can add:
Acked-by: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang at intel.com>