[PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd receive jumbo frame packets

[Wang, Jie1X]

Hi Singh,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:38 PM
> To: Wang, Jie1X <jie1x.wang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, SteveX <stevex.yang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>;
> Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang at intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zhang at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd receive jumbo frame packets
> 
> Hi Jie,
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> 
> On 10/25/2022 7:35 AM, Jie Wang wrote:
> > For NIC I40E_10G-10G_BASE_T_X722, when testpmd is configured with link
> > speed, it cannot receive jumbo frame packets.
> 
> Why only the jumbo frame are effected and not other pkts.
> 

I don't know why only the jumbo frame are effected, when set the link speed, it will update the link status of the NIC ports.
And this phenomenon can only be reproduced on this NIC I40E_10G-10G_BASE_T_X722, and other NICs do not have this phenomenon.
 
> >
> > Because it has changed the link status of the ports if it was
> > configured with link speed.
> 
> If we configure to same link speed, will it still have issue ?
> 

Yes, it is.

> >
> > When exiting testpmd that it automatically stops packet forwarding and
> > stops all the ports. But it doesn't update the link status of the
> > ports. If stop the ports first that it will update the link status.
> >
> > This patch fix the error that testpmd will update the link status of
> > the ports when it exits.
> >
> > Fixes: d3a274ce9dee ("app/testpmd: handle SIGINT and SIGTERM")
> > Fixes: 284c908cc588 ("app/testpmd: request device removal interrupt")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jie Wang <jie1x.wang at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > 97adafacd0..c348a3f328 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ pmd_test_exit(void)
> >   	}
> >   #endif
> >   	if (ports != NULL) {
> > -		no_link_check = 1;
> > +		no_link_check = 0;
> >   		RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(pt_id) {
> >   			printf("\nStopping port %d...\n", pt_id);
> >   			fflush(stdout);
> > @@ -3675,7 +3675,7 @@ rmv_port_callback(void *arg)
> >   		need_to_start = 1;
> >   		stop_packet_forwarding();
> >   	}
> > -	no_link_check = 1;
> > +	no_link_check = 0;
> 
> Well, here we are undoing a previous change done for 284c908cc588 Won't that
> issue come back.
> 
> >   	stop_port(port_id);
> >   	no_link_check = org_no_link_check;
> >