[PATCH v2 1/3] net/mlx5: fix validation for conntrack indirect action

Raslan Darawsheh rasland at nvidia.com
Tue Jul 18 17:51:55 CEST 2023


Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev at nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 4:32 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Slava
> Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>;
> stephen at networkplumber.org; Bing Zhao <bingz at nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] net/mlx5: fix validation for conntrack indirect action
> 
> From: Bing Zhao <bingz at nvidia.com>
> 
> After rte_flow_shared_action_* API was replaced with
> rte_flow_action_handle_* API, one input parameter of the update interface
> was also changed. A generic pointer was used instead of the "const struct
> rte_flow_action *" pointer.
> 
> In the entrance of mlx5 PMD callback for update, the validation is called for all
> indirect actions. But for conntrack type, the pointer is no longer with
> rte_flow_action pointer type and it will cause an incorrect casting and error.
> 
> The content for updating should only be validated when needed. It should skip
> the validation in the entrance. Right now, the content was already added
> before updating the hardware by WQE. So the type of the indirect action
> should be checked before calling the action validate function.
> 
> When creating a new conntrack object, the validation is still needed since all
> the content will be used to update the hardware context.
> 
> Fixes: 40327aab1491 ("ethdev: introduce indirect flow action")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz at nvidia.com>

Series applied to next-net-mlx,

Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh


More information about the stable mailing list