patch 'eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field register in mbuf' has been queued to stable release 21.11.6

[Kevin Traynor]

Hi,

FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 21.11.6

Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet.
It will be pushed if I get no objections before 11/08/23. So please
shout if anyone has objections.

Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the
patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing
needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing
(ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was
correctly done.

Queued patches are on a temporary branch at:
https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable

This queued commit can be viewed at:
https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable/commit/9ae9b9761710653f34c18a14bb973d757be557c6

Thanks.

Kevin

---
>From 9ae9b9761710653f34c18a14bb973d757be557c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Bhansali <rbhansali at marvell.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 22:18:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field register in mbuf

[ upstream commit 5083736a4752e0701002297f871325c57568e1d0 ]

For eventdev internal port, timestamp dynamic field registration
in mbuf is not required as that will be done from net device.
For SW eventdev, Rx timestamp field registration will be
done during rxa service initialization.

Fixes: 83ab470d1259 ("eventdev/eth_rx: use timestamp as dynamic mbuf field")

Signed-off-by: Rahul Bhansali <rbhansali at marvell.com>
Acked-by: Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k at intel.com>
---
 lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
index 2356e2a535..54115cc899 100644
--- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
+++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.c
@@ -1858,4 +1858,11 @@ rxa_init_service(struct event_eth_rx_adapter *rx_adapter, uint8_t id)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (rte_mbuf_dyn_rx_timestamp_register(
+			&event_eth_rx_timestamp_dynfield_offset,
+			&event_eth_rx_timestamp_dynflag) != 0) {
+		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Error registering timestamp field in mbuf\n");
+		return -rte_errno;
+	}
+
 	memset(&service, 0, sizeof(service));
 	snprintf(service.name, ETH_RX_ADAPTER_SERVICE_NAME_LEN,
@@ -2422,11 +2429,4 @@ rxa_create(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
 		rx_adapter->default_cb_arg = 1;
 
-	if (rte_mbuf_dyn_rx_timestamp_register(
-			&event_eth_rx_timestamp_dynfield_offset,
-			&event_eth_rx_timestamp_dynflag) != 0) {
-		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Error registering timestamp field in mbuf\n");
-		return -rte_errno;
-	}
-
 	rte_eventdev_trace_eth_rx_adapter_create(id, dev_id, conf_cb,
 		conf_arg);
-- 
2.41.0

---
  Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty:
---
--- -	2023-11-02 13:09:41.808313704 +0000
+++ 0039-eventdev-eth_rx-fix-timestamp-field-register-in-mbuf.patch	2023-11-02 13:09:40.840163422 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-From 5083736a4752e0701002297f871325c57568e1d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 9ae9b9761710653f34c18a14bb973d757be557c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+[ upstream commit 5083736a4752e0701002297f871325c57568e1d0 ]
+
@@ -12 +13,0 @@
-Cc: stable at dpdk.org
@@ -21 +22 @@
-index e1660713cd..ea7106a1fe 100644
+index 2356e2a535..54115cc899 100644
@@ -24 +25 @@
-@@ -1913,4 +1913,11 @@ rxa_init_service(struct event_eth_rx_adapter *rx_adapter, uint8_t id)
+@@ -1858,4 +1858,11 @@ rxa_init_service(struct event_eth_rx_adapter *rx_adapter, uint8_t id)
@@ -36 +37 @@
-@@ -2475,11 +2482,4 @@ rxa_create(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,
+@@ -2422,11 +2429,4 @@ rxa_create(uint8_t id, uint8_t dev_id,