[PATCH v2] net/vmxnet3: fix a missing vmxnet3 register command

[Ronak Doshi]

Basically it will just provide incorrect information. With the enum being
misaligned due to missing command, GET_DCR0_REG and GET_MAX_CAPABILITIES
will just lead to incorrect commands being issued.

Thanks,
Ronak


On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:35 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at amd.com> wrote:

> On 4/18/2024 7:36 AM, Ronak Doshi wrote:
> > Vmxnet3 uses capability registers to advertise the supported
> > capabilities of UPT device. It uses DCR0_REG command register
> > for this purpose. However, the register command enum misses
> > one command which technically is not used by dpdk vmxnet3
> > driver yet. This can cause issue for commands added later.
> >
> > This patch fixes this issue by adding a reserved
> > command in its place.
> >
> > Fixes: 5241d61bd865 ("net/vmxnet3: support capability registers")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ronak Doshi <ronak.doshi at broadcom.com>
> > --
> > Change log
> > v2: fixed typo
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/vmxnet3/base/vmxnet3_defs.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/base/vmxnet3_defs.h
> b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/base/vmxnet3_defs.h
> > index 24c235876e..a6bb281d8d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/base/vmxnet3_defs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/base/vmxnet3_defs.h
> > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ typedef enum {
> >     VMXNET3_CMD_RESERVED7,
> >     VMXNET3_CMD_RESERVED8,
> >     VMXNET3_CMD_GET_MAX_QUEUES_CONF,
> > +   VMXNET3_CMD_RESERVED11,
> >     VMXNET3_CMD_GET_MAX_CAPABILITIES,
> >     VMXNET3_CMD_GET_DCR0_REG,
> >  } Vmxnet3_Cmd;
>
> Hi Ronak,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> What is the fixed from user perspective, what is the impact.
>
> I can see two commands effected from missing enum, they are GET_DCR0_REG
> & GET_MAX_CAPABILITIES.
> Was user not able to read capabilities, or get random capabilities, from
> device up until now?
> If so what were these capabilities and how user impacted from missing them?
> Can you please detail the impact more in the commit log?
>
>
>

-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/attachments/20240422/ca8fb11a/attachment.htm>