22.11.4 patches review and test

[Xueming(Steven) Li]

Hi Hainlin,

Thanks very much for test test and report!
Let me know once any progress with the known issue.

Thanks,
Xueming.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, HailinX <hailinx.xu at intel.com>
> Sent: 1/11/2024 9:42
> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>; Ali
> Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; benjamin.walker at intel.com; David Christensen
> <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>;
> Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>;
> Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
> <juhlee at microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi
> <bluca at debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>; qian.q.xu at intel.com;
> Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> (EXTERNAL) <thomas at monjalon.net>; Yanghang Liu <yanghliu at redhat.com>;
> yuan.peng at intel.com; zhaoyan.chen at intel.com
> Subject: RE: 22.11.4 patches review and test
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 3:19 PM
> > To: stable at dpdk.org
> > Cc: xuemingl at nvidia.com; dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>;
> > benjamin.walker at intel.com; David Christensen <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
> > Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian
> > <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; Mcnamara,
> > John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>;
> > Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>;
> > Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>; qian.q.xu at intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh
> > <rasland at nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; Yanghang
> > Liu <yanghliu at redhat.com>; yuan.peng at intel.com; zhaoyan.chen at intel.com
> > Subject: 22.11.4 patches review and test
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 22.11.4.
> >
> > The planned date for the final release is 5th January.
> >
> > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
> > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> >
> > A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> >
> >     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v22.11.4-rc3
> >
> > These patches are located at branch 22.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> >     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> 
> Update the test status for Intel part. dpdk22.11.4-rc3 all validation test done.
> Found 1 virtio bug.
> 
> new issue:
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1338: virtio-user can't receive packet:
> this test only on SPR -Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8490H  --Intel development is
> investigating

Maxime, seems the issue related to patch "vhost: fix checking virtqueue access in stats API",
Could you please take a look?

> 
> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang
> version and the popular OS revision such as
>   Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora38, RHEL8.7, RHEL9.2, FreeBSD13.2, SUSE15,
> CentOS7.9, openEuler22.03-SP1，OpenAnolis8.8 etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> 
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow
> Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single
> core performance test, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test -
> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> 
> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
> - All test done. found 1 new issue.
> * Cryptodev:
>   *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-
> L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
>     - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
>   *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance/Cryptodev
> Latency, etc.
>     - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Xu, Hailin
>