22.11.4 patches review and test

[Xueming(Steven) Li]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> Sent: 1/11/2024 16:27
> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>; Xu, HailinX
> <hailinx.xu at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>; Ali
> Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; benjamin.walker at intel.com; stable at dpdk.org;
> David Christensen <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> <jerinj at marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Ju-
> Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>;
> Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezhang at redhat.com>;
> qian.q.xu at intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-
> Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas at monjalon.net>; Yanghang Liu
> <yanghliu at redhat.com>; yuan.peng at intel.com; zhaoyan.chen at intel.com
> Subject: Re: 22.11.4 patches review and test
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/11/24 07:32, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
> > Hi Hainlin,
> >
> > Thanks very much for test test and report!
> > Let me know once any progress with the known issue.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Xueming.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Xu, HailinX <hailinx.xu at intel.com>
> >> Sent: 1/11/2024 9:42
> >> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>;
> >> Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>; benjamin.walker at intel.com; David
> >> Christensen <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> >> <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin
> >> Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>;
> >> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> >> <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> >> <pezhang at redhat.com>; qian.q.xu at intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh
> >> <rasland at nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> >> (EXTERNAL) <thomas at monjalon.net>; Yanghang Liu <yanghliu at redhat.com>;
> >> yuan.peng at intel.com; zhaoyan.chen at intel.com
> >> Subject: RE: 22.11.4 patches review and test
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 3:19 PM
> >>> To: stable at dpdk.org
> >>> Cc: xuemingl at nvidia.com; dev at dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> >>> <Abhishek.Marathe at microsoft.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>;
> >>> benjamin.walker at intel.com; David Christensen
> >>> <drc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>;
> >>> Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes at intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> >>> <jerinj at marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>;
> >>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee at microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> >>> <ktraynor at redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> >>> <pezhang at redhat.com>; qian.q.xu at intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh
> >>> <rasland at nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>;
> >>> Yanghang Liu <yanghliu at redhat.com>; yuan.peng at intel.com;
> >>> zhaoyan.chen at intel.com
> >>> Subject: 22.11.4 patches review and test
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 22.11.4.
> >>>
> >>> The planned date for the final release is 5th January.
> >>>
> >>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> >>> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final
> >>> release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> >>>
> >>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> >>>
> >>>      https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v22.11.4-rc3
> >>>
> >>> These patches are located at branch 22.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> >>>      https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> Update the test status for Intel part. dpdk22.11.4-rc3 all validation test done.
> >> Found 1 virtio bug.
> >>
> >> new issue:
> >> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1338: virtio-user can't receive packet:
> >> this test only on SPR -Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8490H  --Intel
> >> development is investigating
> >
> > Maxime, seems the issue related to patch "vhost: fix checking
> > virtqueue access in stats API", Could you please take a look?
> 
> I will reply in the Bz, but there seems to be 2 backporting issues:
> 
> 1. We miss the unlock on return 0:
> 
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.c b/lib/vhost/vhost.c index 4edb76d0dd..6e1bba4391
> 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2070,6 +2070,12 @@ rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr(int vid, uint16_t
> queue_id,
>   	if (vq == NULL)
>   		return -1;
> 
> +	if (!rte_spinlock_trylock(&vq->access_lock))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!vq->access_ok))
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
>   	if (vq_is_packed(dev)) {
>   		struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
>   		desc = vq->desc_packed;
> @@ -2090,6 +2096,11 @@ rte_vhost_get_monitor_addr(int vid, uint16_t
> queue_id,
>   	}
> 
>   	return 0; <== We miss an unlock here
> +
> +out_unlock:
> +	rte_spinlock_unlock(&vq->access_lock);
> +
> +	return -1;
>   }
> 
> The original patch does it like this:
> 
>   	}
> 
> -	return 0;
> +out_unlock:
> +	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&vq->access_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
> 
> 
> 2. Some unrelated change is introduced:
> 
> @@ -2157,6 +2168,7 @@ int rte_vhost_vring_stats_reset(int vid, uint16_t
> queue_id)
>   {
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> +	int ret = 0;
> 
>   	if (dev == NULL)
>   		return -1;
> 
> Above change fixes a build issue introduce in an earlier patch.
> 
> How do you want to proceed? Do you want a patch on top of 22.11.4?

Thanks for the prompt response, let's have a patch on top of 22.11.4.

> 
> Regards,
> Maxime
> 
> >>
> >> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> >> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest
> GCC/Clang
> >> version and the popular OS revision such as
> >>    Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora38, RHEL8.7, RHEL9.2, FreeBSD13.2,
> SUSE15,
> >> CentOS7.9, openEuler22.03-SP1，OpenAnolis8.8 etc.
> >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> >> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-
> >> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> >>
> >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
> Management/Flow
> >> Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
> >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single
> >> core performance test, etc.
> >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test -
> >> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >>
> >> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> >> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
> >> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
> >> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
> >> - All test done. found 1 new issue.
> >> * Cryptodev:
> >>    *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev
> ISA-
> >> L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
> >>      - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >>    *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput
> Performance/Cryptodev
> >> Latency, etc.
> >>      - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Xu, Hailin
> >>
> >