[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw20067 [RFC 17.05 v1 2/3] LPM config file read option

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/20067

_coding style issues_


WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#106: FILE: examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h:104:
+#define GET_CB_FIELD(in, fd, base, lim, dlm)	do {            \
+	unsigned long val;                                      \
+	char *end;                                              \
+	errno = 0;                                              \
+	val = strtoul((in), &end, (base));                      \
+	if (errno != 0 || end[0] != (dlm) || val > (lim))       \
+		return -EINVAL;                               \
+	(fd) = (typeof(fd))val;                                 \
+	(in) = end + 1;                                         \
+} while (0)

WARNING:CONSTANT_COMPARISON: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
#491: FILE: examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c:233:
+	if (0 == route_num)

WARNING:CONSTANT_COMPARISON: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
#499: FILE: examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c:241:
+	if (NULL == route_rules)

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#614: FILE: examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c:430:
+			(unsigned)route_base_v4[i].ip,

total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 593 lines checked