[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw21349 [PATCH 06/12] net/failsafe: add fail-safe PMD
checkpatch at dpdk.org
checkpatch at dpdk.org
Fri Mar 3 16:41:18 CET 2017
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/21349
_coding style issues_
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#307: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe.c:84:
+ const unsigned socket_id,
CHECK:CAMELCASE: Avoid CamelCase: <eal_parse_pci_DomBDF>
#560: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_args.c:102:
+ eal_parse_pci_DomBDF(args, &d->pci.addr) == 0)
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#719: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_args.c:261:
+ unsigned arg_count;
WARNING:LONG_LINE_STRING: line over 90 characters
#1306: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_ops.c:171:
+ ERROR("Operation rte_eth_dev_set_link_down failed for sub_device %d"
WARNING:LONG_LINE_STRING: line over 90 characters
#1733: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_ops.c:598:
+ ERROR("Operation rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_set failed for sub_device %d"
CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'i' - possible side-effects?
#1980: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:162:
+#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_ST(s, i, dev, state) \
+ for (i = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state); \
+ i < PRIV(dev)->subs_tail && (s = &PRIV(dev)->subs[i]); \
+ i = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state))
CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev' - possible side-effects?
#1980: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:162:
+#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_ST(s, i, dev, state) \
+ for (i = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state); \
+ i < PRIV(dev)->subs_tail && (s = &PRIV(dev)->subs[i]); \
+ i = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state))
CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'state' - possible side-effects?
#1980: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:162:
+#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_ST(s, i, dev, state) \
+ for (i = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state); \
+ i < PRIV(dev)->subs_tail && (s = &PRIV(dev)->subs[i]); \
+ i = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state))
CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev' - possible side-effects?
#1999: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:181:
+#define TX_SUBDEV(dev) \
+ (PRIV(dev)->subs_tx >= PRIV(dev)->subs_tail ? NULL \
+ : (PRIV(dev)->subs[PRIV(dev)->subs_tx].state < DEV_PROBED ? NULL \
+ : &PRIV(dev)->subs[PRIV(dev)->subs_tx]))
CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'ops' may be better as '(ops)' to avoid precedence issues
#2008: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:190:
+#define SUBOPS(s, ops) \
+ (ETH(s)->dev_ops->ops)
total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 2013 lines checked
More information about the test-report
mailing list