[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw35333 [PATCH v2 1/2] Add RIB library
checkpatch at dpdk.org
checkpatch at dpdk.org
Wed Feb 21 22:09:57 CET 2018
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/35333
_coding style issues_
WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#26:
- For dir24_8 implementation it is possible to remove rte_lpm_tbl_entry.depth
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#165: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.c:37:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n) \
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#170: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.c:42:
+ uint32_t prefetch_offset = RTE_MIN((unsigned)bulk_prefetch, n); \
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#699: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:83:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#701: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:85:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#703: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:87:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#705: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:89:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#1285: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_rib.h:15:
+#define RTE_RIB_RETURN_IF_TRUE(cond, retval) do { \
+ if (cond) \
+ return retval; \
+} while (0)
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#1358: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_rib.h:88:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
total: 0 errors, 9 warnings, 1520 lines checked
More information about the test-report
mailing list