|WARNING| pw109439 [PATCH v1 4/4] app/test-pmd-api: Implementation files for the API
checkpatch at dpdk.org
checkpatch at dpdk.org
Thu Apr 7 23:48:39 CEST 2022
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/109439
_coding style issues_
WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'Dispite' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Despite'?
#1279: FILE: app/test-pmd-api/api_impl.h:6:
+Dispite this file being attached to a C++ file, all definitions must remain ISO C. In additon,
WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'additon' may be misspelled - perhaps 'addition'?
#1279: FILE: app/test-pmd-api/api_impl.h:6:
+Dispite this file being attached to a C++ file, all definitions must remain ISO C. In additon,
WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
#1279: FILE: app/test-pmd-api/api_impl.h:6:
+/*
+Dispite this file being attached to a C++ file, all definitions must remain ISO C. In additon,
WARNING:MISSING_EOF_NEWLINE: adding a line without newline at end of file
#1283: FILE: app/test-pmd-api/api_impl.h:10:
+void rte_testpmd_run();
ERROR:FUNCTION_WITHOUT_ARGS: Bad function definition - void rte_testpmd_run() should probably be void rte_testpmd_run(void)
#1283: FILE: app/test-pmd-api/api_impl.h:10:
+void rte_testpmd_run();
total: 1 errors, 4 warnings, 1181 lines checked
More information about the test-report
mailing list