[dpdk-users] Performance Problem of DPDK pkt-gen

Royce Niu royceniu at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 16:41:26 CET 2016


Yes.

The problem is the sending rate is not 14Mpps when L2FWD is working.

When L2FWD is working, the sending rate is about 4Mpps, instead of 14Mpps.
When I close the L2FWD pc, the sending rate recovers to 14Mpps...

I think there is something wrong with my Pktgen PC. Could you help me check
my commands? Or is there anything wrong?



On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles at intel.com> wrote:

> From: Royce Niu <royceniu at gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:30 AM
> To: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles at intel.com>
> Cc: Royce Niu <royceniu at gmail.com>, "users at dpdk.org" <users at dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Performance Problem of DPDK pkt-gen
>
> Hi, Keith
>
> Maybe, since I didn't configure the CPU affinity in the L2FWD pc on
> purpose so far.
>
> But, my question is the first PC have a poor sending rate when L2FWD is
> working in second PC.
>
> You mean the problem is related to L2FWD?
>
>
> The sending rate of the Pktgen PC should be constant, but the forwarding
> rate of the second PC maybe the problem because sending packets received on
> one socket and then being send by another socket is a problem as the QPI
> bus between sockets is not as fast.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles at intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >Dear all,
>> >
>> >I am using an server with 4 cpus (4 x 8 core CPUs with HT) and NICs
>> (X520).
>> >
>> >When I use pkt-gen on NIC1 or NIC2, the speed of generating 64Byte is
>> >14Mpps.
>> >
>> >If I generating both on NIC1 and NIC2, the speed of  generating 64Byte on
>> >both are more than  13Mpps.
>> >
>> >However, I use same configuration PC (with DPDK L2FWD) to bridge NIC1 and
>> >NIC2, so I can generate packet on NIC1 and receive these packets on NIC2
>> in
>> >pkt-gen. The speed of generating is decreased to 4Mpps and the receive
>> rate
>> >is 3Mpps.
>>
>> I am not sure how you configured the second PC for L2FWD, but I suspect
>> the L2FWD is having to receive packets on socket 0 and send the packets on
>> socket 1, this means the QPI bus gets involved here. Is this the case?
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >I want to know why generating speed is slower than the situation without
>> >the bridge of NIC1 and NIC2?  how to solve these problem?
>> >
>> >The detailed information is as following.
>> >
>> >sudo sysctl vm.nr_hugepages=4096
>> >echo 1024 | sudo tee
>> >/sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>> >echo 1024 | sudo tee
>> >/sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>> >echo 1024 | sudo tee
>> >/sys/devices/system/node/node2/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>> >echo 1024 | sudo tee
>> >/sys/devices/system/node/node3/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>> >
>> >
>> >sudo mkdir -p /dev/hugepages
>> >sudo mount -t hugetlbfs nodev /dev/hugepages
>> >
>> >
>> >sudo dpdk-2.2.0/tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py --status
>> >sudo modprobe uio
>> >sudo insmod dpdk-2.2.0/build/kmod/igb_uio.ko
>> >
>> >sudo dpdk-2.2.0/tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py -b igb_uio 04:00.0 04:00.1
>> >sudo dpdk-2.2.0/tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py --status
>> >
>> >cd pktgen-2.9.12/
>> >
>> >sudo app/build/pktgen -c 0x1f -n 3 --proc-type auto --socket-mem
>> >128,128,128,128 -- -P -m "[1:3].0, [2:4].1" -f test/set_seq.pkt
>> >
>> >I tried to change -m, but, sometime there is no packet generated by
>> >pkt-gen.
>> >
>> >
>> >The core map is :
>> >
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 0 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 0 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 0 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 4 as core 1 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 5 as core 1 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 6 as core 1 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 7 as core 1 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 8 as core 2 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 9 as core 2 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 10 as core 2 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 11 as core 2 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 12 as core 3 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 13 as core 3 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 14 as core 3 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 15 as core 3 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 16 as core 4 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 17 as core 4 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 18 as core 4 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 19 as core 4 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 20 as core 5 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 21 as core 5 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 22 as core 5 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 23 as core 5 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 24 as core 6 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 25 as core 6 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 26 as core 6 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 27 as core 6 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 28 as core 7 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 29 as core 7 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 30 as core 7 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 31 as core 7 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 32 as core 0 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 33 as core 0 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 34 as core 0 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 35 as core 0 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 36 as core 1 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 37 as core 1 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 38 as core 1 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 39 as core 1 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 40 as core 2 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 41 as core 2 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 42 as core 2 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 43 as core 2 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 44 as core 3 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 45 as core 3 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 46 as core 3 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 47 as core 3 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 48 as core 4 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 49 as core 4 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 50 as core 4 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 51 as core 4 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 52 as core 5 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 53 as core 5 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 54 as core 5 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 55 as core 5 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 56 as core 6 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 57 as core 6 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 58 as core 6 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 59 as core 6 on socket 3
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 60 as core 7 on socket 0
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 61 as core 7 on socket 1
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 62 as core 7 on socket 2
>> >EAL: Detected lcore 63 as core 7 on socket 3
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Regards,
>> >
>> >Royce Niu
>> >
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Royce Niu
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Keith
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Royce Niu


More information about the users mailing list