[dpdk-users] qos_sched in DPDK 17.11.0 fails to initialize mbuf pool

[Ian Trick]

Hi. I'm having an issue starting the qos_sched example program.

# ./examples/qos_sched/build/qos_sched --no-huge -l 1,2,3 --vdev
net_af_packet0,iface=eth1 -- --pfc "0,0,2,3" --cfg
examples/qos_sched/profile_ov.cfg

EAL: Detected 16 lcore(s)
EAL: Probing VFIO support...
EAL: Started without hugepages support, physical addresses not available
EAL: PCI device 0000:08:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL:   Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0
EAL:   probe driver: 8086:10d3 net_e1000_em
PMD: Initializing pmd_af_packet for net_af_packet0
PMD: net_af_packet0: AF_PACKET MMAP parameters:
PMD: net_af_packet0:    block size 4096
PMD: net_af_packet0:    block count 256
PMD: net_af_packet0:    frame size 2048
PMD: net_af_packet0:    frame count 512
PMD: net_af_packet0: creating AF_PACKET-backed ethdev on numa socket 0
EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
  Cause: Cannot init mbuf pool for socket 0


This is version 17.11.0 from the repo. My RTE_TARGET is
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang. eth1 is a veth. I've tried running with
`-m` and using a low value but the issue still happens.

>From what I can tell, rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() is failing and rte_errno
is set to EINVAL.

In librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c, the function
rte_mempool_populate_virt() is succeeding this test and returning -EINVAL:

	if (RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(len, pg_sz) != len)
		return -EINVAL;

In that context, len is mz->len, the length of a memzone passed by the
caller, rte_mempool_populate_default(). Which got it here:

	mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(mz_name, size,
		mp->socket_id, mz_flags, align);
	/* not enough memory, retry with the biggest zone we have */
	if (mz == NULL)
		mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(mz_name, 0,
			mp->socket_id, mz_flags, align);

This fails the first call, and succeeds the second when it passes 0 as
the size. memzone_reserve_aligned_thread_unsafe(), in
librte_eal/common/eal_common_memzone.c, gets the length this way:

	requested_len = find_heap_max_free_elem(&socket_id, align);

So the align value is 4096. But the value returned by
find_heap_max_free_elem() isn't aligned to that -- I think? Since it
fails the check later on.

I'm not sure if this is a thing with my environment where I don't have
enough memory? (Although I would have expected a different error for
that.) Or I don't have the right program arguments? Or one of these
functions isn't doing what it's supposed to?